Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Inverse Laplace transform
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Post's inversion formula== '''Post's inversion formula''' for [[Laplace transform]]s, named after [[Emil Leon Post|Emil Post]],<ref name="Post1930">{{cite journal|last1=Post|first1=Emil L.|title=Generalized differentiation|journal=Transactions of the American Mathematical Society|volume=32|issue=4|year=1930|pages=723–781|issn=0002-9947|doi=10.1090/S0002-9947-1930-1501560-X|doi-access=free}}</ref> is a simple-looking but usually impractical formula for evaluating an inverse Laplace transform. The statement of the formula is as follows: Let <math>f(t)</math> be a continuous function on the interval <math>[0,\infty)</math> of exponential order, i.e. : <math>\sup_{t>0} \frac{f(t)}{e^{bt}} < \infty</math> for some real number <math>b</math>. Then for all <math>s > b</math>, the Laplace transform for <math>f(t)</math> exists and is infinitely differentiable with respect to <math>s</math>. Furthermore, if <math>F(s)</math> is the Laplace transform of <math>f(t)</math>, then the inverse Laplace transform of <math>F(s)</math> is given by : <math>f(t) = \mathcal{L}^{-1} \{F\}(t) = \lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{(-1)^k}{k!} \left( \frac{k}{t} \right) ^{k+1} F^{(k)} \left( \frac{k}{t} \right)</math> for <math>t > 0</math>, where <math>F^{(k)}</math> is the <math>k</math>-th derivative of <math>F</math> with respect to <math>s</math>. As can be seen from the formula, the need to evaluate derivatives of arbitrarily high orders renders this formula impractical for most purposes. With the advent of powerful personal computers, the main efforts to use this formula have come from dealing with approximations or asymptotic analysis of the Inverse Laplace transform, using the [[Grunwald–Letnikov differintegral]] to evaluate the derivatives. Post's inversion has attracted interest due to the improvement in computational science and the fact that it is not necessary to know where the [[Pole (complex analysis)|poles]] of <math>F(s)</math> lie, which make it possible to calculate the asymptotic behaviour for big <math>x</math> using inverse [[Mellin transform]]s for several arithmetical functions related to the [[Riemann hypothesis]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)