Editing Iraq Body Count project (section)

==Method==
The IBC overview page states: "Deaths in the database are derived from a comprehensive survey of commercial media and NGO-based reports, along with official records that have been released into the public sphere. Reports range from specific, incident based accounts to figures from hospitals, morgues, and other documentary data-gathering agencies."<ref name="IBC Methods Overview">[http://www.iraqbodycount.org/about/methods/1/ Methods. Iraq Body Count. Overview.] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090416235939/http://www.iraqbodycount.org/about/methods/1 |date=16 April 2009 }}</ref>

Project volunteers sample news stories to extract minimum and maximum numbers of civilian casualties. Each incident reported at least by two independent news sources is included in the Iraq Body Count database. In December 2007, IBC announced that they would begin to include deaths reported by one source, and that the number of deaths provided by such reports would be openly tracked on its database page.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iraqbodycount.org/analysis/reference/announcements/3/|title=IBC begins to include single-sourced reports from credible sources :: Iraq Body Count|work=IraqBodyCount.org|access-date=3 February 2017}}</ref> Between 3.3 and 3.5 percent of deaths recorded by IBC are currently{{When|date=February 2017}} listed on the database page as derived from a single source.

IBC is purely a civilian count. IBC defines ''civilian'' to exclude Iraqi soldiers, insurgents, suicide bombers or any others directly engaged in war-related violence. A "min" and "max" figure are used where reports differ on the numbers killed, or where the civilian status of the dead is uncertain.

IBC is not an "estimate" of total civilian deaths based on projections or other forms of extrapolation. It is a compilation of documented deaths, as reported by English-language media worldwide. See the sources section farther down for more info on the media and their sources.

Some{{Who|date=September 2010}} have suggested bias of sources could affect the count. If a number is quoted from an anti-coalition source, and the Allies fail to give a sufficiently specific{{Vague|date=February 2017}} alternate number, the anti-coalition figure is entered into IBC's database as both a maximum and a minimum. The same works vice versa. The project argues that these potential over- and undercounts by different media sources would tend to balance out.{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}}

IBC's online database shows the newspaper, magazine or website where each number is reported, and the date on which it was reported. However, this has been criticized{{By whom|date=February 2017}} as insufficient because it typically does not list the original sources for the information: that is, the NGO, journalist or government responsible for the number presented. Hence, any inherent bias due to the lack of reliable reports from independent or Allied sources is not readily available to the reader.