Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Jonathan Wild
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Coming into his own== Crime had risen dramatically in London beginning in 1680, and property crime, in particular, rose sharply as London grew in importance as a commercial hub. In 1712 [[Charles Hitchen]], Wild's forerunner and future rival as [[thief-taker]], said that he personally knew 2,000 people in London who made their living solely by theft. In 1711, Hitchen had obtained public office as the City's Under Marshal, effectively its top policeman, paying Β£700 (Β£{{Inflation|GBP|700|1711|r=-3|fmt=c}} in {{CURRENTYEAR}}) for the appointment. He abused his office, however, by practising [[extortion]] on an extravagant scale, both from thieves and from their potential victims.<ref name="moore63">Moore, p. 63.</ref> He would accept bribes to let thieves out of jail, selectively arrest criminals, and coerce sexual services from [[molly house]]s. Hitchen's [[testimony#Legal testimony|testimony]] about the rise of crime was given during an investigation of these activities by the London [[Board of Aldermen]], who suspended him from the Under Marshal position in 1713. In around 1713, Wild was approached by Hitchen to become one of his assistants in thief-taking, a profitable activity on account of the Β£40 reward (Β£{{Inflation|GBP|40|1713|r=-3|fmt=c}} in {{CURRENTYEAR}}) paid by the government for catching a felon. Wild may have become known to Hitchen's associates, known as his "Mathematicians", during his lengthy stay in Wood Street Compter; certainly one, William Field, later worked for Wild.<ref name="moore63"/> The advent of daily newspapers had led to a rising interest in crime and criminals. As the papers reported notable crimes and ingenious attacks, the public worried more and more about property crime and grew increasingly interested in the issues of criminals and policing. London depended entirely upon localised policing and had no citywide police force. Unease with crime was at a feverish high. The public was eager to embrace both colourful criminals (e.g. [[Jack Sheppard]] and the entirely upper-class gang called the "[[Mohocks]]" in 1712) and valiant crime-fighters. The city's population had more than doubled, and there was no effective means of controlling crime. London saw a rise not only in thievery, but in [[organised crime]] during the period. The ending of the [[War of the Spanish Succession]] in 1714 meant a further increase in crime as demobilised soldiers were on the streets. By this time, Hitchen was restored to his office but Wild went his own way, opening a small office in the Blue Boar tavern run by Mrs Seagoe in Little Old Bailey.<ref name="moore65"/> Wild continued to call himself Hitchen's "Deputy", entirely [[vigilantism|without any official standing]], and took to carrying a sword as a mark of his supposed authority, also alluding to pretensions of gentility.<ref name="moore65"/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)