Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Kripke–Platek set theory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Empty set === If any set <math>c</math> is postulated to exist, such as in the axiom of infinity, then the axiom of empty set is redundant because it is equal to the subset <math>\{x\in c\mid x\neq x\}</math>. Furthermore, the existence of a member in the universe of discourse, i.e., ∃x(x=x), is implied in certain formulations<ref>{{cite book |title=A course in model theory: an introduction to contemporary mathematical logic |url=https://archive.org/details/courseinmodelthe0000poiz |url-access=registration |last=Poizat |first=Bruno |year=2000 |publisher=Springer |isbn=0-387-98655-3}}, note at end of §2.3 on page 27: "Those who do not allow relations on an empty universe consider (∃x)x=x and its consequences as theses; we, however, do not share this abhorrence, with so little logical ground, of a vacuum."</ref> of [[first-order logic]], in which case the axiom of empty set follows from the axiom of Δ<sub>0</sub>-separation, and is thus redundant.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)