Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Linezolid
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Skin and soft tissue infections=== A large [[meta-analysis]] of randomized controlled trials found linezolid to be more effective than glycopeptide antibiotics (such as vancomycin and [[teicoplanin]]) and [[beta-lactam antibiotic]]s in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) caused by Gram-positive bacteria,<ref name=Falagas2008>{{cite journal |vauthors=Falagas ME, Siempos II, Vardakas KZ |title=Linezolid versus glycopeptide or beta-lactam for treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |journal=Lancet Infectious Diseases |volume=8 |issue=1 |pages=53β66 |date=January 2008 |pmid=18156089 |doi=10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70312-2 |issn=1473-3099}} Structured abstract with quality assessment available at [http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/CRDWeb/ShowRecord.asp?ID=12008005415 DARE] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111004094022/http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/CRDWeb/ShowRecord.asp?ID=12008005415 |date=4 October 2011 }}.</ref> and smaller studies appear to confirm its superiority over teicoplanin in the treatment of all serious Gram-positive infections.<ref name=Tascini>{{cite journal |vauthors=Tascini C, Gemignani G, Doria R, etal |title=Linezolid treatment for gram-positive infections: a retrospective comparison with teicoplanin |journal=Journal of Chemotherapy |volume=21 |issue=3 |pages=311β6 |date=June 2009 |pmid=19567352 |issn=1120-009X |doi=10.1179/joc.2009.21.3.311|s2cid=19381342 }}</ref> In the treatment of diabetic foot infections, linezolid appears to be cheaper and more effective than vancomycin.<ref name=Chow>{{cite journal | vauthors = Chow I, Lemos EV, Einarson TR | title = Management and prevention of diabetic foot ulcers and infections: a health economic review | journal = PharmacoEconomics | volume = 26 | issue = 12 | pages = 1019β35 | year = 2008 | pmid = 19014203 | doi = 10.2165/0019053-200826120-00005 | s2cid = 30903985 }}</ref> In a 2004 [[open-label study]], it was as effective as [[ampicillin/sulbactam]] and [[amoxicillin/clavulanic acid]], and far superior in patients with foot ulcers and no [[osteomyelitis]], but with significantly higher rates of adverse effects.<ref name=Lipsky>{{cite journal | vauthors = Lipsky BA, Itani K, Norden C | title = Treating foot infections in diabetic patients: a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial of linezolid versus ampicillin-sulbactam/amoxicillin-clavulanate | journal = Clinical Infectious Diseases | volume = 38 | issue = 1 | pages = 17β24 | date = January 2004 | pmid = 14679443 | doi = 10.1086/380449 | s2cid = 20586344 | doi-access = }}</ref><ref name=Pigrau>{{cite journal | vauthors = Pigrau C, Almirante B | title = [Oxazolidinones, glycopeptides and cyclic lipopeptides] | language = es | journal = Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica | volume = 27 | issue = 4 | pages = 236β46 | date = April 2009 | pmid = 19406516 | doi = 10.1016/j.eimc.2009.02.004 | url = http://www.elsevier.es/sites/default/files/elsevier/pdf/28/28v27n04a13136682pdf001.pdf | trans-title = Oxazolidinones, glycopeptides and cyclic lipopeptides | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110723082633/http://www.elsevier.es/sites/default/files/elsevier/pdf/28/28v27n04a13136682pdf001.pdf | url-status = dead | archive-date = 23 July 2011 }}</ref> A 2008 meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials, however, found that linezolid treatment failed as often as other antibiotics, regardless of whether patients had osteomyelitis.<ref name=Vardakas>{{cite journal | vauthors = Vardakas KZ, Horianopoulou M, Falagas ME | title = Factors associated with treatment failure in patients with diabetic foot infections: An analysis of data from randomized controlled trials | journal = Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice | volume = 80 | issue = 3 | pages = 344β51 | date = June 2008 | pmid = 18291550 | doi = 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.01.009 }}</ref> Some authors have recommended that combinations of cheaper or more cost-effective drugs (such as [[co-trimoxazole]] with [[rifampicin]] or [[clindamycin]]) be tried before linezolid in the treatment of SSTIs when susceptibility of the causative organism allows it.<ref name=Pigrau/><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Grammatikos A, Falagas ME |title=Linezolid for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infection |journal=[[Expert Review of Dermatology]] |volume=3 |issue=5 |pages=539β48 |year=2008 |doi=10.1586/17469872.3.5.539}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)