Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Man on the Clapham omnibus
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Other related common law jurisdictions== The expression has also been incorporated in Canadian patent jurisprudence, notably ''Beloit v. Valmet Oy''<ref name="1OdQx">''Beloit v. Valmet Oy'' (1986), C.P.R. (3d) 289</ref> in its discussion of the test for obviousness.<ref name="QsEUq">{{Citation |first1=Donald M. |last1=Cameron |first2=Ogilvy |last2=Renault |date=30 December 2006|title=case comment: Beloit Canada Ltd. v. Valmet Oy citation(s): (1986) 8 C.P.R. (3d) 289 |publisher=JurisDictioncom |url=http://www.jurisdiction.com/beloit.htm}}</ref> In Australia, the "Clapham omnibus" expression has inspired the New South Wales and Victorian equivalents, "the man on the Bondi tram" (a now disused tram route in Sydney),<ref name="40QyY">{{Citation |last=Asprey |first=Michèle M. |year=2010 |orig-year=2003 |title=Plain Language for Lawyers |publisher=Federation Press |page=119 |isbn=978-1-86287-775-7}}</ref> "the man on the [[Melbourne tram route 96|Bourke Street tram]]" ([[Melbourne]]),<ref name="3umqM">{{cite AustLII|AATA|18|1991|litigants=Re Sortirios Pandos and Commonwealth of Australia}}.</ref> and "the ordinary person on the Belconnen omnibus" (Canberra).<ref>{{Cite web |date=15 April 2024 |title=Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Limited (Trial Judgment) [2024] FCA 369, [597] |url=https://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2024/369.html |access-date=16 April 2024 |website=Austlii}}</ref> In Hong Kong, the equivalent expression is "the man on the [[Hong Kong Tramways|Shau Kei Wan tram]]".<ref name="2MPEV">{{Citation |author=SFAT |year=2009 |url=http://www.sfat.gov.hk/english/determination/AN-7_and_8_and_9-2007-Determination.pdf |title=Ng Chiu Mui v Securities and Futures Commission Application No 7 of 2007 (15 May 2009) |publisher=Securities and Futures Appeals Tribunal |page=30|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110722075521/http://www.sfat.gov.hk/english/determination/AN-7_and_8_and_9-2007-Determination.pdf|archive-date=2011-07-22|url-status=dead}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)