Editing Matthew 1:8 (section)

==Analysis==
The first part of this verse coincides with the list of the [[Kings of Judah]] that is present in a number of other parts of the [[Bible]].  According to [[William F. Albright]], [[Asa of Judah]] ruled from [[913 BC]] to 873 BC. His son [[Jehoshaphat]] ruled from 873 BC to 849 BC.  His son [[Jehoram of Judah|Jehoram]] ruled from Jehoshaphat's death until 842 BC.  However the other lists have Jehoram's son being [[Ahaziah of Judah|Ahaziah]] while [[Uzziah]] is a monarch who comes several generations later.{{Citation needed|date=September 2015}}

This means that Matthew's genealogy skips Ahaziah, [[Athaliah]], [[Jehoash of Judah|Jehoash]], and [[Amaziah of Judah|Amaziah]].  Those who believe in the [[Biblical inerrancy|inerrancy of the Bible]] {{Who|date=September 2015}} contend that the genealogy was never meant to be complete and the author of Matthew deliberately dropped those who were not needed from the list.  Simply dropping unnecessary figures from genealogies was a common practice, and this is also done in several points in the Old Testament. One theory is that they were dropped because of their wickedness, but the even more unpleasant [[Manasseh of Judah|Manasseh]] is left in the list. All four were also murdered, but so was [[Amon of Judah|Amon]], who also remains in place. Their reigns were also relatively short, but again there are other monarchs with shorter reigns included. Another theory says that names were omitted to achieve multiples of seven.<ref>Zondervan NIV (New International Version) Study Bible, 2002, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA, p. 580.</ref>

[[Robert H. Gundry]] supports the popular theory that these monarchs were left out because they were all descendants of [[Ahab]], [[Kingdom of Israel (Samaria)|King of Israel]] through his daughter [[Athaliah]].  Ahab's descendants, the [[Omrides]], were said to have been punished for four generations.  Gundry also believes their removal was because the author was trying to divide the genealogy into the three lists of fourteen as mentioned in [[Matthew 1:17]].<ref>[[Robert H. Gundry|Gundry, Robert H.]] ''Matthew a Commentary on his Literary and Theological Art.'' Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1982.</ref>

Albright and Mann have a different theory.  They believe that the author, or a later scribe, confused Achaziah and Uzziah due to the similarity of the two rulers' names.  In a common scribal transcription error, known as [[homoioteleuton]], Uzziah was given Achaziah's position as the son of Jehoram but remained as father of [[Jotham]].  Under this theory the triple-fourteen parallelism was only created after this error appeared.  Thus the comment in Matthew 1:17 would have had to have been added by a later editor and not the original author.<ref>[[William F. Albright|Albright, W.F.]] and C.S. Mann. "Matthew." ''[[The Anchor Bible Series]].'' New York: Doubleday & Company, 1971.</ref> Harold Fowler rejects this view, arguing that the error was so obvious when checked against the Old Testament that if the change would quickly have been reversed if it were not deliberate.<ref>Fowler, Harold. ''The Gospel of Matthew: Volume One.'' Joplin: College Press, 1968.</ref>