Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Maya numerals
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Modified vigesimal system in the Maya calendar == [[File:La Mojarra Estela 1 (Escritura superior).jpg|thumb|266x266px|Detail showing in the right columns glyphs from [[La Mojarra Stela 1]]. The left column uses Maya numerals to show a [[Mesoamerican Long Count calendar|Long Count date]] of 8.5.16.9.7 or 156 CE.]] The "Long Count" portion of the [[Maya calendar]] uses a variation on the strictly vigesimal numerals to show a [[Mesoamerican Long Count calendar|Long Count date]]. In the second position, only the digits up to 17 are used, and the [[positional notation|place value]] of the third position is not 20×20 = 400, as would otherwise be expected, but 18×20 = 360 so that one dot over two zeros signifies 360. Presumably, this is because 360 is roughly the number of days in a [[year]]. (The Maya had however a quite accurate estimation of 365.2422 days for the [[Solar Year|solar year]] at least since the early [[Maya civilization#Classic period|Classic era]].)<ref>{{cite book | title=The Mayans | publisher=Lucent Books, Inc. | author=Kallen, Stuart A. | year=1955 | location=San Diego, CA | pages=[https://archive.org/details/mayans00kall/page/56 56] | isbn=1-56006-757-8 | url-access=registration | url=https://archive.org/details/mayans00kall/page/56 }}</ref> Subsequent positions use all twenty digits and the place values continue as 18×20×20 = 7,200 and 18×20×20×20 = 144,000, etc. Every known example of large numbers in the Maya system uses this 'modified vigesimal' system, with the third position representing multiples of 18×20. It is reasonable to assume, but not proven by any evidence, that the normal system in use was a pure base-20 system.<ref>Anderson, W. French. “Arithmetic in Maya Numerals.” American Antiquity, vol. 36, no. 1, 1971, pp. 54–63</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)