Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Microhistory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Approach == The most distinctive aspect of the microhistorical approach is the small scale of investigations.{{sfn|Tristano|1996|p=26}} Microhistorians focus on small units in society, as a reaction to the generalisations made by the social sciences which do not necessarily hold up when tested against these smaller units.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Magnússon |first=Sigurdur Gylfi |title='The Singularization of History': Social History and Microhistory within the Postmodern State of Knowledge |journal=[[Journal of Social History]] |volume=36 |issue=3 |year=2003 |page=709 |doi=10.1353/jsh.2003.0054 |s2cid=144942672}}</ref> For instance, Ginzburg's 1976 work ''[[The Cheese and the Worms]]'' – "probably the most popular and widely read work of microhistory"{{sfn|Tristano|1996|p=26}} – investigates the life of a single sixteenth-century Italian miller, [[Menocchio]]. The individuals microhistorical works are concerned with are frequently those whom Richard M. Tristano describes as "little people", especially those considered heretics.{{sfn|Tristano|1996|p=26-27}} Carlo Ginzburg has written that a core principle of microhistory is making obstacles in sources, such as [[lacuna (manuscripts)|lacunae]], part of the historical account.{{sfn|Ginzburg|1993|p=28}} Relatedly, Levi has said that the point of view of the researcher becomes part of the account in microhistory.{{sfn|Levi|1991|page=106}} Other notable aspects of microhistory as a historical approach are an interest in the interaction of elite and popular culture,{{sfn|Tristano|1996|p=28}} and an interest in the interaction between micro- and macro-levels of history.{{sfn|Tristano|1996|p=27}} Since the 2010s, historical research has expanded to include the field of “global microhistory,”<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ghobrial |first=John-Paul |date=2019 |title=Global History and Microhistory |url=https://academic.oup.com/past/issue/242/Supplement_14 |journal=Past & Present |issue=Supplement 14 |via=}}</ref> which seeks to combine the detailed focus of microhistorical studies with broader transregional or global perspectives.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Bertrand |first=Romain |last2=Calafat |first2=Guillaume |date=2018 |title=Global Microhistory: A Case to Follow |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/annales-histoire-sciences-sociales-english-edition/article/abs/global-microhistory-a-case-to-follow/0BE435ECBC8A6B5D7796E377D628B022 |journal=Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales - English Edition |language=en |volume=73 |issue=1 |pages=3–17 |doi=10.1017/ahsse.2020.9 |issn=|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)