Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Modern Library
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Modern Library lists == {{main|Modern Library's 100 Best Novels}} At its onset the Modern Library identified itself as "The Modern Library of the World's Best Books". In keeping with that brand identity, in 1998 the editors created a list they called the "[[Modern Library List of Best 20th-Century Novels]]", numbering 100 titles selected from books published by Modern Library and its Random House affiliates. They also conducted an [[Online and phone-in polls|internet poll]] of public opinion, then produced a ''readers''' list. (The lists were actually restricted to works in English, but titles of the lists do not represent this, and little attention was paid to that fact in publicity for the lists.) The "top ten" of the [[Modern Library 100 Best Novels|editors' list is shown here]]βand the two "100 Best Novels" lists are linked below. According to a ''[[New York Times]]'' article about the list, executives at Random House said they hoped that as the century drew to a close their list would encourage public debate about the greatest works of fiction of the last hundred years, thus both increasing awareness of the Modern Library and stimulating sales of novels the group publishes.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/library/books/072098best-novels.html|date=July 20, 1998|title='Ulysses' on Top Among 100 Best Novels|work=The New York Times|first=Paul|last=Lewis|access-date=May 9, 2022}}</ref> Both lists have incurred criticism. Their ranking system concerned many professional scholars and critics. The board members themselves, who did not create the rankings and were unaware of it until the list was published, expressed disappointment and puzzlement.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/books/features/novels0805.htm |title=The Lowdown on the Literary List |newspaper=The Washington Post|author=Streitfeld, David }}</ref> There were also hypotheses that the Modern Library merely made a selection based on its stocklist.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Sound-and-Fury-Over-Top-Novel-List-N-Y-3000087.php |title=Sound and Fury Over Top Novel List N.Y. publisher's selections signify little, critics say |work=[[San Francisco Chronicle]]|author=Rubenstein, Steve |date=July 21, 1998}}</ref> [[A. S. Byatt]], the well-known English novelist who was on the board, called the list "typically American".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1998/07/20/books/ulysses-at-top-as-panel-picks-100-best-novels.html|title='Ulysses' at Top As Panel Picks 100 Best Novels|last=Lewis|first=Paul|date=July 20, 1998|work=The New York Times|access-date=October 27, 2017|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> The list was compiled via [[approval voting]], by sending each board member a list of 440 pre-selected books from the Modern Library catalogue and asking each member to place a check beside novels they wished to choose. Then the works with the most votes were ranked the highest, and ties were decided arbitrarily by Random House publishers. This explains surprising results like the No. 5 placement of ''[[Brave New World]]'' (1932), which most of the judges agreed belonged ''somewhere'' on the list, but much lower than the very top. [[David Ebershoff]], the Modern Library division's publishing director, stated in a follow-up "the people who were drawn to go to the Modern Library Web site and compelled to vote have a certain enthusiasm about books and their favourite books that many people don't, so that the voting population is skewed."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.caj.ca/mediamag/fall2002/opinion.html |publisher=CAJ.ca|date=Fall 2002|title=Opinion}}</ref> In addition, people were allowed to vote repeatedly, once per day, making the poll a measure of how much effort people would put into promoting their favorite books. Others have been more direct in their descriptions of the results; librarian Robert Teeter remarks that the ballot boxes were "stuffed by cultists".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.interleaves.org/~rteeter/greatbks.html |publisher=Interleaves.org|title=Great Books}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)