Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Moment problem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Existence== A sequence of numbers <math>m_n</math> is the sequence of moments of a measure <math>\mu</math> if and only if a certain positivity condition is fulfilled; namely, the [[Hankel matrices]] <math>H_n</math>, :<math>(H_n)_{ij} = m_{i+j}\,,</math> should be [[positive-definite matrix|positive semi-definite]]. This is because a positive-semidefinite Hankel matrix corresponds to a linear functional <math> \Lambda</math> such that <math>\Lambda(x^n) = m_n</math> and <math> \Lambda(f^2) \geq 0 </math> (non-negative for sum of squares of polynomials). Assume <math> \Lambda</math> can be extended to <math> \mathbb{R}[x]^*</math>. In the univariate case, a non-negative polynomial can always be written as a sum of squares. So the linear functional <math> \Lambda</math> is positive for all the non-negative polynomials in the univariate case. By Haviland's theorem, the linear functional has a measure form, that is <math> \Lambda(x^n) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x^n d \mu</math>. A condition of similar form is necessary and sufficient for the existence of a measure <math>\mu</math> supported on a given interval <math>[a,b]</math>. One way to prove these results is to consider the linear functional <math>\varphi</math> that sends a polynomial :<math>P(x) = \sum_k a_k x^k </math> to :<math>\sum_k a_k m_k.</math> If <math>m_k</math> are the moments of some measure <math>\mu</math> supported on <math>[a,b]</math>, then evidently {{NumBlk|::|<math> \varphi(P) \ge 0</math> for any polynomial <math>P</math> that is non-negative on <math>[a,b]</math>.|{{EquationRef|1}}}} Vice versa, if ({{EquationNote|1}}) holds, one can apply the [[M. Riesz extension theorem]] and extend <math>\varphi</math> to a functional on the [[Function space#Functional analysis|space of continuous functions with compact support]] <math>C_c([a,b])</math>), so that {{NumBlk|::|<math>\varphi(f) \ge 0</math> for any <math>f \in C_c([a,b]),\;f\ge 0.</math>|{{EquationRef|2}}}} By the [[Riesz representation theorem#The representation theorem for linear functionals on Cc.28X.29|Riesz representation theorem]], ({{EquationNote|2}}) holds iff there exists a measure <math>\mu</math> supported on <math>[a,b]</math>, such that :<math> \varphi(f) = \int f \, d\mu</math> for every <math>f \in C_c([a,b])</math>. Thus the existence of the measure <math>\mu</math> is equivalent to ({{EquationNote|1}}). Using a representation theorem for positive polynomials on <math>[a,b]</math>, <!-- This is due to Riesz or Fejer (or maybe both); a ref. is needed (maybe Szego's book?) --> one can reformulate ({{EquationNote|1}}) as a condition on Hankel matrices.{{sfn|Shohat|Tamarkin|1943}}{{sfn|Kreĭn |Nudel′man|1977}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)