Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Numeracy
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Definitions and assessment== Fundamental (or rudimentary) numeracy skills include understanding of the real number line, time, measurement, and estimation.<ref name="Reyna2009">{{cite journal |last1=Reyna |first1=V.F. |last2=Nelson |first2=W.L. |last3=Han |first3=P.K. |last4=Dieckmann |first4=N.F. |title=How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making |doi=10.1037/a0017327 |journal=Psychological Bulletin |volume=135 |issue=6 |pages=943β973 |year=2009 |pmid=19883143 |pmc=2844786}}</ref> Fundamental skills include basic skills (the ability to identify and understand numbers) and computational skills (the ability to perform simple arithmetical operations and compare numerical magnitudes). More sophisticated numeracy skills include understanding of ratio concepts (notably fractions, proportions, percentages, and probabilities), and knowing when and how to perform multistep operations.<ref name="Reyna2009" /> Two categories of skills are included at the higher levels: the analytical skills (the ability to understand numerical information, such as required to interpret graphs and charts) and the statistical skills (the ability to apply higher probabilistic and statistical computation, such as conditional probabilities). A variety of tests have been developed for assessing numeracy and health numeracy.<ref name="Reyna2009" /><ref name="Peters2012"/><ref name="Schwartz1997">{{cite journal |last1=Schwartz |first1=L.M. |last2=Woloshin |first2=S. |last3=Black |first3=W.C. |last4=Welch |first4=H.G. |title=The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography |doi=10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00003 |journal=Annals of Internal Medicine |volume=127 |issue=11 |pages=966β972 |year=1997 |pmid=9412301 |s2cid=19412405 }}</ref><ref name="Lipkus2001">{{cite journal |last1=Lipkus |first1=I.M. |last2=Samsa |first2=G. |last3=Rimer |first3=B.K. |doi=10.1177/0272989X0102100105 |title=General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples |journal=Medical Decision Making |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=37β44 |year=2001 |pmid=11206945 |s2cid=25249366 }}</ref><ref name="Cokely2012">{{cite journal |last1=Cokely |first1=E.T. |last2=Galesic |first2=M. |last3=Schulz |first3=E. |last4=Ghazal |first4=S. |last5=Garcia-Retamero |first5=R. |year=2012 |title=Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test |url=http://journal.sjdm.org/11/11808/jdm11808.pdf |journal=Judgment and Decision Making |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=25β47 |doi=10.1017/S1930297500001819 |s2cid=11617465 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Schapira |first1=M.M. |last2=Walker |first2=C.M. |last3=Cappaert |first3=K.J. | last4=Ganschow |first4=P.S. |last5=Fletcher |first5=K.E. |last6=McGinley |first6=E.L. |last7=Del Pozo |first7=S. |last8=Schauer |first8=C. |last9=Tarima |first9=S. |last10=Jacobs |first10=E.A. |doi=10.1177/0272989X12447239 |title=The Numeracy Understanding in Medicine Instrument: A Measure of Health Numeracy Developed Using Item Response Theory |journal=Medical Decision Making |volume=32 |issue=6 |pages=851β865 |year=2012 |pmid=22635285 |pmc=4162626}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Fagerlin |first1=A. |last2=Zikmund-Fisher |first2=B.J. |last3=Ubel |first3=P.A. |last4=Jankovic |first4=A. |last5=Derry |first5=H.A. |last6=Smith |first6=D.M. |doi=10.1177/0272989X07304449 |title=Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale |journal=Medical Decision Making |volume=27 |issue=5 |pages=672β680 |year=2007 |pmid=17641137 |s2cid=30150256 }}</ref> Different tests have been developed to evaluate health numeracy. Two of these tests that have been found to be "reliable and valid" are the GHNT-21 and GHNT-6.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Osborn|first1=Chandra Y.|last2=Wallston|first2=Kenneth A.|last3=Shpigel|first3=Adam|last4=Cavanaugh|first4=Kerri|last5=Kripalani|first5=Sunil|last6=Rothman|first6=Russell L.|date=June 2013|title=Development and Validation of the General Health Numeracy Test (GHNT)|journal=Patient Education and Counseling|volume=91|issue=3|pages=350β356|doi=10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.001|issn=0738-3991|pmc=3644342|pmid=23433635}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)