Editing Privoxy (section)

==Reception==
Shashank Sharma of ''[[Linux Format]]'' rated it 9/10 stars and wrote, "Privoxy is highly customisable, easy to set up, has good documentation and is fun to work with. Use it!"<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.techradar.com/us/news/software/applications/6-of-the-best-content-filters-for-linux-698307/3|title=6 of the best content filters for Linux: SafeSquid and Privoxy|last=Sharma|first=Shashank|journal=[[Linux Format]]|issue=133|date=2010-06-25|access-date=2014-03-27|via=[[Tech Radar]] |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150501200259/http://www.techradar.com/us/news/software/applications/6-of-the-best-content-filters-for-linux-698307/3 |archive-date= May 1, 2015 }}</ref>  Erez Zukerman of ''[[PC World]]'' rated it 4/5 stars and called it complicated but powerful.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/252136/privoxy.html|title=Avoid Ads and Creepy Tracking Scripts With Privoxy|last=Zukerman|first=Erez|work=[[PC World]]|date=2012-03-19|access-date=2014-03-27 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140328081213/http://www.pcworld.com/article/252136/privoxy.html |archive-date= Mar 28, 2014 }}</ref>  Michelle Delio of [[Wired.com|Wired]] called it "an outstanding way to protect one's privacy".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://archive.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2004/05/63442?currentPage=all|title=A Tightwad's Guide to Ad Blockers|last=Delio|first=Michelle|work=[[Wired.com|Wired]]|date=2004-05-14|access-date=2014-03-27|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140418085206/http://archive.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2004/05/63442?currentPage=all |archive-date=2014-04-18}}</ref>