Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Proof that e is irrational
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Fourier's proof== The most well-known proof is [[Joseph Fourier]]'s [[proof by contradiction]],<ref>{{Cite book | last1 = de Stainville | first1 = Janot | year = 1815 | title = Mélanges d'Analyse Algébrique et de Géométrie |trans-title=A mixture of Algebraic Analysis and Geometry | publisher = Veuve Courcier | pages = 340–341}}</ref> which is based upon the equality : <math>e = \sum_{n = 0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}.</math> Initially ''e'' is assumed to be a rational number of the form {{sfrac|''a''|''b''}}. The idea is to then analyze the scaled-up difference (here denoted ''x'') between the series representation of ''e'' and its strictly smaller {{nowrap|''b''-th}} partial sum, which approximates the limiting value ''e''. By choosing the scale factor to be the [[factorial]] of ''b'', the fraction {{sfrac|''a''|''b''}} and the {{nowrap|''b''-th}} partial sum are turned into [[integer]]s, hence ''x'' must be a positive integer. However, the fast convergence of the series representation implies that ''x'' is still strictly smaller than 1. From this contradiction we deduce that ''e'' is irrational. Now for the details. If ''e'' is a [[rational number]], there exist positive integers ''a'' and ''b'' such that {{nowrap|1=''e'' = {{sfrac|''a''|''b''}}}}. Define the number : <math>x = b!\left(e - \sum_{n = 0}^{b} \frac{1}{n!}\right).</math> Use the assumption that ''e'' = {{sfrac|''a''|''b''}} to obtain : <math>x = b!\left (\frac{a}{b} - \sum_{n = 0}^{b} \frac{1}{n!}\right) = a(b - 1)! - \sum_{n = 0}^{b} \frac{b!}{n!}.</math> The first term is an integer, and every fraction in the sum is actually an integer because {{nowrap|''n'' ≤ ''b''}} for each term. Therefore, under the assumption that ''e'' is rational, ''x'' is an integer. We now prove that {{nowrap|0 < ''x'' < 1}}. First, to prove that ''x'' is strictly positive, we insert the above series representation of ''e'' into the definition of ''x'' and obtain : <math>x = b!\left(\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n!} - \sum_{n = 0}^{b} \frac{1}{n!}\right) = \sum_{n = b+1}^{\infty} \frac{b!}{n!}>0,</math> because all the terms are strictly positive. We now prove that {{nowrap|''x'' < 1}}. For all terms with {{nowrap|''n'' ≥ ''b'' + 1}} we have the upper estimate : <math>\frac{b!}{n!} =\frac1{(b + 1)(b + 2) \cdots \big(b + (n - b)\big)} \le \frac1{(b + 1)^{n-b}}.</math> This inequality is strict for every {{nowrap|''n'' ≥ ''b'' + 2}}. Changing the index of summation to {{nowrap|1=''k'' = ''n'' – ''b''}} and using the formula for the [[Geometric series|infinite geometric series]], we obtain :<math>x =\sum_{n = b + 1}^\infty \frac{b!}{n!} < \sum_{n=b+1}^\infty \frac1{(b + 1)^{n-b}} =\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac1{(b + 1)^k} =\frac{1}{b+1} \left (\frac1{1 - \frac1{b + 1}}\right) = \frac{1}{b} \le 1.</math> And therefore <math>x<1.</math> Since there is no integer strictly between 0 and 1, we have reached a contradiction, and so ''e'' is irrational, [[Q.E.D.]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)