Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Pythagorean expectation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=="Second-order" and "third-order" wins== In their Adjusted Standings Report,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.baseballprospectus.com/statistics/standings.php|title=Baseball Prospectus - Adjusted Standings|access-date=7 May 2016}}</ref> [[Baseball Prospectus]] refers to different "orders" of wins for a team. The basic order of wins is simply the number of games they have won. However, because a team's record may not reflect its true talent due to luck, different measures of a team's talent were developed. First-order wins, based on pure [[run differential]], are the number of expected wins generated by the "pythagenport" formula (see above). In addition, to further filter out the distortions of luck, [[Sabermetrician]]s can also calculate a team's ''expected'' runs scored and allowed via a [[runs created]]-type equation (the most accurate at the team level being [[Base Runs]]). These formulas result in the team's expected number of runs given their offensive and defensive stats (total singles, doubles, walks, etc.), which helps to eliminate the luck factor of the order in which the team's hits and walks came within an inning. Using these stats, sabermetricians can calculate how many runs a team "should" have scored or allowed. By plugging these expected runs scored and allowed into the pythagorean formula, one can generate second-order wins, the number of wins a team deserves based on the number of runs they should have scored and allowed given their component offensive and defensive statistics. Third-order wins are second-order wins that have been adjusted for strength of schedule (the quality of the opponent's pitching and hitting). Second- and third-order winning percentage has been shown{{according to whom|date=October 2015}} to predict future actual team winning percentage better than both actual winning percentage and first-order winning percentage.{{citation needed|date=February 2020}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)