Editing Reference management software (section)

==Research on software usage==
In 2013, a comparison of usage of [[EndNote]], [[RefWorks]], and [[Zotero]] among the legal scholars at the Oxford University Law Faculty was performed by survey. 0% of survey participants used RefWorks; 40% used Endnote; 17% used Zotero, mostly research students. The difficulty of using RefWorks, Endnote, and Zotero by Oxford legal scholars was estimated by the author as well. A comparison of these tools for legal scholars was made across several usage scenarios, including: installing and setting up [[Oxford Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities|OSCOLA citation style]]; building a personal legal bibliographic library and using extracting metadata from legal bibliographic databases; generating footnotes and bibliographies for academic publications; using and modifying OSCOLA citation style.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Meredith |first=Sandra |date=2013-01-21 |title=Critical review of referencing software when used with OSCOLA |journal=European Journal of Law and Technology |volume=4 |issue=1 |doi=10.2139/ssrn.2184098 |issn=2042-115X}}</ref>

In the same year, a survey conducted at the [[University of Turin]] found that knowledge of software was high but adoption was not, and the most known and used software was EndNote.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Francese |first=Enrico |year=2013 |title=Usage of Reference Management Software at the University of Torino |url=https://www.jlis.it/index.php/jlis/article/view/244 |journal=JLIS.it |publisher=University of Florence |volume=4 |issue=2 |doi=10.4403/jlis.it-8679 |access-date=2022-06-04}}</ref>