Editing Regression fallacy (section)

==Examples==
<blockquote>When his pain got worse, he went to a doctor, after which the pain subsided a little. Therefore, he benefited from the doctor's treatment.</blockquote>

The pain subsiding a little after it has gotten worse is more easily explained by regression toward the mean. Assuming the pain relief was caused by the doctor is fallacious.

<blockquote>The student did exceptionally poorly last semester, so I punished him. He did much better this semester. Clearly, punishment is effective in improving students' grades.</blockquote>

Often exceptional performances are followed by more normal performances, so the change in performance might better be explained by regression toward the mean. Incidentally, some experiments have shown that people may develop a systematic bias for punishment and against reward because of reasoning analogous to this example of the regression fallacy.<ref>Schaffner, 1985; Gilovich, 1991 pp. 27–28</ref>

<blockquote>The frequency of accidents on a road fell after a speed camera was installed. Therefore, the speed camera has improved road safety.</blockquote>

Speed cameras are often installed after a road incurs an exceptionally high number of accidents, and this value usually falls (regression to mean) immediately afterward. Many speed camera proponents attribute this fall in accidents to the speed camera, without observing the overall trend.

Some authors use the [[Sports Illustrated cover jinx|''Sports Illustrated'' cover jinx]] as an example of a regression effect: extremely good performances are likely to be followed by less extreme ones, and athletes are chosen to appear on the cover of ''[[Sports Illustrated]]'' only after extreme performances. Attributing this to a "[[jinx]]" rather than regression, as some athletes reportedly believe, is an example of committing the regression fallacy.<ref>Gilovich, 1991 pp. 26–27; Plous, 1993 p. 118</ref>