Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Regular cardinal
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Properties == If the [[axiom of choice]] holds, then every [[successor cardinal]] is regular. Thus the regularity or singularity of most aleph numbers can be checked depending on whether the cardinal is a successor cardinal or a limit cardinal. Some cardinalities cannot be proven to be equal to any particular aleph, for instance the [[cardinality of the continuum]], whose value in ZFC may be any uncountable cardinal of uncountable cofinality (see [[Easton's theorem]]). The [[continuum hypothesis]] postulates that the cardinality of the continuum is equal to <math>\aleph_1</math>, which is regular assuming choice. Without the axiom of choice: there would be cardinal numbers that were not well-orderable. {{citation needed|date=August 2024}} Moreover, the cardinal sum of an arbitrary collection could not be defined.{{citation needed|date=August 2024}} Therefore, only the [[aleph number]]s could meaningfully be called regular or singular cardinals.{{citation needed|date=August 2024}}Furthermore, a successor aleph would need not be regular. For instance, the union of a countable set of countable sets would not necessarily be countable. It is consistent with [[Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory|ZF]] that <math>\omega_1</math> be the limit of a countable sequence of countable ordinals as well as the set of [[real number]]s be a countable union of countable sets.{{citation needed|date=August 2024}} Furthermore, it is consistent with ZF when not including AC that every aleph bigger than <math>\aleph_0</math> is singular (a result proved by [[Moti Gitik]]). If <math>\kappa</math> is a limit ordinal, <math>\kappa</math> is regular iff the set of <math>\alpha<\kappa</math> that are critical points of <math>\Sigma_1</math>-[[Elementary embedding|elementary embeddings]] <math>j</math> with <math>j(\alpha)=\kappa</math> is [[Club set|club]] in <math>\kappa</math>.<ref>T. Arai, "Bounds on provability in set theories" (2012, p.2). Accessed 4 August 2022.</ref> For cardinals <math>\kappa<\theta</math>, say that an elementary embedding <math>j:M\to H(\theta)</math> a ''small embedding'' if <math>M</math> is transitive and <math>j(\textrm{crit}(j))=\kappa</math>. A cardinal <math>\kappa</math> is uncountable and regular iff there is an <math>\alpha>\kappa</math> such that for every <math>\theta>\alpha</math>, there is a small embedding <math>j:M\to H(\theta)</math>.<ref>Holy, Lücke, Njegomir, "[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168007218301167 Small embedding characterizations for large cardinals]". Annals of Pure and Applied Logic vol. 170, no. 2 (2019), pp.251--271.</ref><sup>Corollary 2.2</sup>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)