Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Regular space
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Relationships to other separation axioms == A regular space is necessarily also [[preregular space|preregular]], i.e., any two [[topologically distinguishable]] points can be separated by neighbourhoods. Since a Hausdorff space is the same as a preregular [[Kolmogorov space|T<sub>0</sub> space]], a regular space which is also T<sub>0</sub> must be Hausdorff (and thus T<sub>3</sub>). In fact, a regular Hausdorff space satisfies the slightly stronger condition [[Urysohn and completely Hausdorff spaces|T<sub>2Β½</sub>]]. (However, such a space need not be [[Completely Hausdorff space|completely Hausdorff]].) Thus, the definition of T<sub>3</sub> may cite T<sub>0</sub>, [[T1 space|T<sub>1</sub>]], or T<sub>2Β½</sub> instead of T<sub>2</sub> (Hausdorffness); all are equivalent in the context of regular spaces. Speaking more theoretically, the conditions of regularity and T<sub>3</sub>-ness are related by [[Kolmogorov quotient]]s. A space is regular if and only if its Kolmogorov quotient is T<sub>3</sub>; and, as mentioned, a space is T<sub>3</sub> if and only if it's both regular and T<sub>0</sub>. Thus a regular space encountered in practice can usually be assumed to be T<sub>3</sub>, by replacing the space with its Kolmogorov quotient. There are many results for topological spaces that hold for both regular and Hausdorff spaces. Most of the time, these results hold for all preregular spaces; they were listed for regular and Hausdorff spaces separately because the idea of preregular spaces came later. On the other hand, those results that are truly about regularity generally don't also apply to nonregular Hausdorff spaces. There are many situations where another condition of topological spaces (such as [[normal space|normality]], [[Pseudonormal space|pseudonormality]], [[paracompactness]], or [[local compactness]]) will imply regularity if some weaker separation axiom, such as preregularity, is satisfied.<ref>{{cite web |title=general topology - Preregular and locally compact implies regular |url=https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1272957 |website=Mathematics Stack Exchange}}</ref> Such conditions often come in two versions: a regular version and a Hausdorff version. Although Hausdorff spaces aren't generally regular, a Hausdorff space that is also (say) locally compact will be regular, because any Hausdorff space is preregular. Thus from a certain point of view, regularity is not really the issue here, and we could impose a weaker condition instead to get the same result. However, definitions are usually still phrased in terms of regularity, since this condition is more well known than any weaker one. Most topological spaces studied in [[mathematical analysis]] are regular; in fact, they are usually [[completely regular space|completely regular]], which is a stronger condition. Regular spaces should also be contrasted with [[normal space]]s.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)