Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Roth's theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Discussion== The first result in this direction is [[Liouville's theorem (transcendence theory)|Liouville's theorem]] on approximation of algebraic numbers, which gives an approximation exponent of ''d'' for an algebraic number α of degree ''d'' ≥ 2. This is already enough to demonstrate the existence of [[transcendental number]]s. Thue realised that an exponent less than ''d'' would have applications to the solution of [[Diophantine equation]]s and in '''Thue's theorem''' from 1909 established an exponent <math>d/2 + 1 + \varepsilon</math> which he applied to prove the finiteness of the solutions of [[Thue equation]]. Siegel's theorem improves this to an exponent about 2{{radic|''d''}}, and Dyson's theorem of 1947 has exponent about {{radic|2''d''}}. Roth's result with exponent 2 is in some sense the best possible, because this statement would fail on setting <math>\varepsilon = 0</math>: by [[Dirichlet's theorem on diophantine approximation]] there are infinitely many solutions in this case. However, there is a stronger conjecture of [[Serge Lang]] that :<math>\left|\alpha - \frac{p}{q}\right| < \frac{1}{q^2 \log(q)^{1+\varepsilon}}</math> can have only finitely many solutions in integers ''p'' and ''q''. If one lets α run over the whole of the set of [[real number]]s, not just the algebraic reals, then both Roth's conclusion and Lang's hold for [[almost everywhere|almost all]] <math>\alpha</math>. So both the theorem and the conjecture assert that a certain [[countable set]] misses a certain set of [[measure zero]].<ref>It is also closely related to the [[Arithmetic of abelian varieties#Manin–Mumford conjecture|Manin–Mumford conjecture]].</ref> The theorem is not currently [[Effective results in number theory|effective]]: that is, there is no [[upper and lower bounds|bound]] known on the possible values of ''p'',''q'' given <math>\alpha</math>.<ref name=HindrySilverman344>{{citation | first1=Marc | last1=Hindry | first2=Joseph H. | last2=Silverman | author-link2=Joseph H. Silverman | title=Diophantine Geometry: An Introduction | series=[[Graduate Texts in Mathematics]] | volume=201 | year=2000 | isbn=0-387-98981-1 | pages=344–345}}</ref> {{harvtxt|Davenport|Roth|1955}} showed that Roth's techniques could be used to give an effective bound for the number of ''p''/''q'' satisfying the inequality, using a "gap" principle.<ref name=HindrySilverman344/> The fact that we do not actually know ''C''(ε) means that the project of solving the equation, or bounding the size of the solutions, is out of reach.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)