Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Saber-toothed predator
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Diet== [[File:Smilodon fatalis.jpg|thumb|Reconstruction of a ''[[Smilodon]]'']] The evolution of enlarged canines in Tertiary carnivores was a result of large mammals being the source of prey for saber-toothed predators. The development of the saber-toothed condition appears to represent a shift in function and killing behavior, rather than one in predator-prey relations. Many hypotheses exist concerning saber-tooth killing methods, some of which include attacking soft tissue such as the belly and throat, where biting deep was essential to generate killing blows. The elongated teeth also aided with strikes reaching major blood vessels in these large mammals. However, the precise functional advantage of the saber-tooth's bite, particularly in relation to prey size, is a mystery. A new point-to-point bite model is introduced in the article by Andersson et al., showing that for saber-tooth cats, the depth of the killing bite decreases dramatically with increasing prey size.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Andersson | first1 = K. | last2 = Norman | first2 = D. | last3 = Werdelin | first3 = L. | year = 2011 | title = Sabretoothed Carnivores and the Killing of Large Prey | journal = PLOS ONE | volume = 6 | issue = 10| pages = 1β6 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0024971 | pmid=22039403 | pmc=3198467| bibcode = 2011PLoSO...624971A | doi-access = free }}</ref> The extended gape of saber-toothed cats results in a considerable increase in bite depth when biting into prey with a radius of less than 10 cm. For the saber-tooth, this size-reversed functional advantage suggests predation on species within a similar size range to those attacked by present-day carnivorans, rather than "megaherbivores" as previously believed. A disputing view of the cat's hunting technique and ability is presented by [[C. K. Brain]] in ''The Hunters or the Hunted?'', in which he attributes the cat's prey-killing abilities to its large neck muscles rather than its jaws.<ref name=Bain/> Large cats use both the upper and lower jaw to bite down and bring down the prey. The strong bite of the jaw is accredited to the strong temporalis muscle that attach from the skull to the coronoid process of the jaw. The larger the coronoid process, the larger the muscle that attaches there, so the stronger the bite. As C.K. Brain points out, the saber-toothed cats had a greatly reduced coronoid process and therefore a disadvantageously weak bite. The cat did, however, have an enlarged mastoid process, a muscle attachment at the base of the skull, which attaches to neck muscles. According to C.K. Brain, the saber-tooth would use a "downward thrust of the head, powered by the neck muscles" to drive the large upper canines into the prey. This technique was "more efficient than those of true cats".<ref name=Bain>[[C. K. Brain|Brain, C. K.]] "Part 2: Fossil Assemblages from the Sterkfontein Valley Caves: Analysis and Interpretation." In: ''The Hunters or the Hunted?: An Introduction to African Cave Taphonomy''. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1981. {{ISBN|0226070891}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)