Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Set of uniqueness
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Early research == The [[empty set]] is a set of uniqueness. This simply means that if a trigonometric series converges to zero ''everywhere'' then it is trivial. This was proved by [[Bernhard Riemann|Riemann]], using a delicate technique of double formal integration; and showing that the resulting sum has some generalized kind of second derivative using [[Toeplitz operator]]s. Later on, [[Georg Cantor]] generalized Riemann's techniques to show that any [[Countable set|countable]], [[closed set]] is a set of uniqueness, a discovery which led him to the development of [[set theory]]. [[Paul Cohen]], another innovator in set theory, started his career with a thesis on sets of uniqueness. As the theory of [[Lebesgue integration]] developed, it was assumed that any set of zero [[Measure (mathematics)|measure]] would be a set of uniqueness — in one dimension the locality principle for Fourier series shows that any set of positive measure is a set of multiplicity (in higher dimensions this is still an open question). This was disproved by [[Dmitrii Menshov|Dimitrii E. Menshov]] who in 1916 constructed an example of a set of multiplicity which has measure zero.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)