Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Single-point urban interchange
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Advantages=== The most commonly cited advantages of SPUIs are improved operation efficiency and safety as well as reduced right-of-way requirements compared to other interchange forms.<ref name=bonneson>{{cite journal |last= Bonneson |first= James A. |date=January 1993 |title= Bridge Size and Clearance Time of Single Point Urban Interchange |journal= Journal of Transportation Engineering |publisher= American Society of Civil Engineers |volume= 119 |issue=1 |pages=77β93 |doi=10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1993)119:1(77) |issn= 0733-947X}}</ref> Left-turning traffic from both directions of the intersecting roadways is able to turn simultaneously without crossing the path of the opposing left turns. Because traffic passing through the interchange can be controlled by a single signal, vehicles can clear the intersection much more quickly than in a diamond interchange (which requires two sets of traffic signals). SPUIs also allow for wider turns, easing movement for large vehicles, such as trucks and RVs. Furthermore, a SPUI takes up considerably less space than a full [[cloverleaf interchange]], allowing construction to take place on a limited amount of property and minimizing state use of [[eminent domain]].<ref>{{cite web |author= St. Louis District |publisher= Missouri Department of Transportation |url= http://www.modot.org/stlouis/links/SPUIFrequentlyAskedQuestions.htm |title= Single Point Urban Interchange Frequently Asked Questions |access-date= July 15, 2012 |archive-date= July 23, 2012 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120723034644/http://www.modot.org/stlouis/links/SPUIFrequentlyAskedQuestions.htm |url-status= live }}</ref> Finally, SPUIs are reportedly safer than other space-efficient interchange forms, such as (standard) diamond interchanges. Research suggests that, although there may not be a significant difference between the two types of interchanges in terms of total collisions, the injury and fatality rates are notably lower for SPUIs than diamond interchanges.<ref>{{cite journal |first1= Joe |last1= Bared |first2= Alvin |last2= Powell |first3= Evangelos |last3= Kaisar |first4= Ramanujan |last4= Jagannathan |date=May 2005 |title= Crash Comparison of Single Point and Tight Diamond Interchanges |journal= Journal of Transportation Engineering |publisher= American Society of Civil Engineers |volume= 131 |issue= 5 |pages= 379β381 |doi= 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:5(379) |s2cid= 110625815 |issn= 0733-947X}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)