Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Solid rocket booster
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Disadvantages== Solid propellant boosters are not controllable and must generally burn until exhaustion after ignition, unlike liquid propellant or [[Cold gas thruster|cold-gas]] propulsion systems. However, launch abort systems and [[range safety]] destruct systems can attempt to cut off propellant flow by using [[Shaped charge|shaped charges]].<ref>{{Cite journal|title = Shock Initiation Studies of the NASA Solid Rocket Booster Abort System|url = http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADP005341|date = 1986-08-01|language = en|first = Douglas G.|last = Tasker|journal = |access-date = 2016-02-08|archive-date = 2016-02-13|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160213215445/http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADP005341|url-status = dead}}</ref> {{as of |1986}} estimates for SRB failure rates have ranged from 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 100,000.<ref>{{Cite news|title = NASA Estimate of Rocket Risk Disputed|url = https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-03-05-mn-15406-story.html|newspaper = Los Angeles Times|date = 1986-03-05|access-date = 2016-02-08|issn = 0458-3035|language = en-US|first = MICHAEL|last = WINES}}</ref> SRB assemblies have failed suddenly and catastrophically. Nozzle blocking or deformation can lead to overpressure or a reduction in thrust, while defects in the booster's casing or stage couplings can cause the assembly to break apart by increasing aerodynamic stresses. Additional failure modes include bore choking and combustion instability.<ref>{{Cite web|title = Solid Rocket Motor Failure Prediction - Introduction|url = http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/pcoe/solid-rocket-motor-failure-prediction/introduction/|website = ti.arc.nasa.gov|access-date = 2016-02-08|url-status = dead|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160814173318/http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/pcoe/solid-rocket-motor-failure-prediction/introduction/|archive-date = 2016-08-14}}</ref> Failure of an [[O-ring]] seal on the ''Challenger'' space shuttle's right solid rocket booster led to its [[Space Shuttle Challenger disaster|disintegration]] shortly after liftoff. Solid rocket motors can present a handling risk on the ground, as a fully fueled booster carries a risk of accidental ignition. Such an accident occurred in the August 2003 [[Brazilian rocket explosion]] at the Brazilian [[Centro de Lançamento de Alcântara]] VLS rocket launch pad, killing 21 technicians.<ref>[http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/vls.htm VLS<!-- Bot generated title -->] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050812074304/http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/vls.htm |date=2005-08-12 }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)