Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Spin quantum number
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== History == {{Also | Spin (physics)#History }} During the period between 1916 and 1925, much progress was being made concerning the arrangement of electrons in the [[periodic table]]. In order to explain the [[Zeeman effect]] in the Bohr atom, Sommerfeld proposed that electrons would be based on three 'quantum numbers', n, k, and m, that described the size of the orbit, the shape of the orbit, and the direction in which the orbit was pointing.<ref>Manjit Kumar, Quantum: Einstein, Bohr and the Great Debate About the Nature of Reality, 2008.</ref> [[Irving Langmuir]] had explained in his 1919 paper regarding electrons in their shells, "Rydberg has pointed out that these numbers are obtained from the series <math>N = 2(1 + 2^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 + 3^2 + 4^2)</math>. The factor two suggests a fundamental two-fold symmetry for all stable atoms."<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Langmuir |first=Irving |date=1919 |title=The arrangement of electrons in atoms and molecules |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016003219910970 |journal=Journal of the Franklin Institute |language=en |volume=187 |issue=3 |pages=359β362 |doi=10.1016/S0016-0032(19)91097-0|url-access=subscription }}</ref> This <math>2n^2</math> configuration was adopted by [[Edmund Stoner]], in October 1924 in his paper 'The Distribution of Electrons Among Atomic Levels' published in the [[Philosophical Magazine]]. The qualitative success of the Sommerfeld quantum number scheme failed to explain the Zeeman effect in weak magnetic field strengths, the [[anomalous Zeeman effect]]. In December 1924, [[Wolfgang Pauli]] showed that the core electron angular momentum was not related to the effect as had previously been assumed.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Giulini |first=Domenico |date=September 2008 |title=Electron spin or "classically non-describable two-valuedness" |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1355219808000269 |journal=Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics |language=en |volume=39 |issue=3 |pages=557β578 |doi=10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.03.005|arxiv=0710.3128 |bibcode=2008SHPMP..39..557G |hdl=11858/00-001M-0000-0013-13C8-1 |s2cid=15867039 }}</ref>{{rp|563}} Rather he proposed that only the outer "light" electrons determined the angular momentum and he hypothesized that this required a fourth quantum number with a two-valuedness.<ref>Wolfgang Pauli. [https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/pauli-lecture.pdf Exclusion principle and quantum mechanics] Nobel Lecture delivered on December 13th 1946 for the 1945 Nobel Prize in Physics.</ref> This fourth quantum number became the spin [[magnetic quantum number]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)