Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Stanford prison experiment
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Publishing == Before publishing in [[American Psychologist]] and other [[Academic journal|peer-reviewed journals]], the researchers reported the findings in ''Naval Research Reviews'',<ref name="auto2">{{cite journal |last1=Haney |first1=C. |last2=Banks |first2=C. |last3=Zimbardo |first3=P. |date=September 1973|title=A study of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison|journal=Naval Research Reviews |url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=nyp.33433016863114&view=1up&seq=313 |via=HathiTrust }}</ref> ''International Journal of Criminology and Penology'' (IJCP),<ref name="Haney Banks Zimbardo 1973" /> and the ''[[The New York Times Magazine|New York Times Magazine]]''.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Zimbardo|first=P.|date=April 8, 1973|title=The mind is a formidable jailer|language=en-US|page=38|work=The New York Times|issue=|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1973/04/08/archives/a-pirandellian-prison-the-mind-is-a-formidable-jailer.html|access-date=November 9, 2021|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> [[David Amodio]], psychology instructor at both New York University and the University of Amsterdam, dismissed Zimbardo's study, stating that releasing the article to an "obscure journal" demonstrated that Zimbardo was unable to convince fellow psychologists of the validity and reliability of his study. This action by Zimbardo violated the tradition of scientific dissemination by publishing in other journals before publishing in a scientific peer-reviewed journal.<ref>{{cite tweet|number=1006958012756561920|user=david_m_amodio|title=Btw, the effects of the SPE fraud are far more devastating than any Stapel finding; it's given leaders cover for huβ¦<!-- full text of tweet that Twitter returned to the bot (excluding links) added by TweetCiteBot. This may be better truncated or may need expanding (TW limits responses to 140 characters) or case changes. --> |date=June 13, 2018}}</ref>{{better source needed|reason=[[WP:SPS]] on Twitter|date=November 2024}} Zimbardo has stated that the grant agreement with the [[Office of Naval Research]] included a requirement to publish data in their journal, ''Naval Research Reviews''. He states that the ''International Journal of Criminology and Penology'' invited Zimbardo to write about his study in their journal, and he then wrote an article with the ''New York Times Magazine'' to share the findings with a broad audience. He states that the article still needed to pass through the very strict requirements of the American Psychologist, the official journal of the [[American Psychological Association]], in order to be published. After publishing the article in the American Psychologist, the findings were also reported in other peer-reviewed journals and books.<ref name="auto"/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)