Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Stephen Kinzer
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Views== Kinzer's reporting on Central America was criticized by [[Edward S. Herman]] and [[Noam Chomsky]] in their book ''[[Manufacturing Consent]]'' (1988), which cited Edgar Chamorro ("selected by the CIA as press spokesman for the contras") in his interview by [[Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting]] describing Kinzer as "just responding to what the White House is saying".<ref name="auto">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Kv_-bvCqgrEC&pg=PA382|title=Manufacturing Consent|author1-last=Chomsky|author1-first=Noam|author2-last=Herman|author2-first=Edweard S.|author-link1=Noam Chomsky|author-link2=Edward S. Herman|year=2002|publisher=[[Pantheon Books]]|isbn=978-0375714498}}</ref> In chapter 2 of ''[[Manufacturing Consent]]'', Kinzer is criticized for deploying no skepticism in his coverage of the murders of [[Grupo de Apoyo Mutuo|GAM]] leaders in Guatemala and for "generally employing an apologetic framework" for the Guatemalan military state.<ref name="auto"/> Kinzer has since that time criticized [[interventionism (politics)|interventionist]] [[foreign policy of the United States|U.S. foreign policy]] toward [[Latin America]] and more recently, the [[Middle East]].<ref>[http://www.democracynow.org/2008/3/3/stephen_kinzer_on_the_us_iranian Interview about the United States and Iran], ''[[Democracy Now!]],'' March 3, 2008 (video, audio, and print transcript)</ref> In ''[[Overthrow (book)|Overthrow: America's Century of Regime Change From Hawaii to Iraq]]'' (2006), he critiqued U.S. foreign policy as overly interventionist.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5325069|title=Author Kinzer Charts 'Century of Regime Change'|publisher=[[NPR]]|date=April 5, 2006}}</ref> In a 2010 interview with ''Imagineer'' Magazine, he said: {{quote|The effects of U.S. intervention in Latin America have been overwhelmingly negative. They have had the effect of reinforcing brutal and unjust social systems and crushing people who are fighting for what we would actually call "American values." In many cases, if you take Chile, Guatemala, or Honduras for examples, we actually overthrew governments that had principles similar to ours and replaced those democratic, quasi-democratic, or nationalist leaders with people who detest everything the United States stands for.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.imagineermagazine.com/index.php/issue_archives/autumn/stephen_kinzer|title=Imagineer :: Stephen Kinzer|date=December 3, 2009|url-status=usurped|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091203105316/http://www.imagineermagazine.com/index.php/issue_archives/autumn/stephen_kinzer|archive-date=December 3, 2009}}</ref>}} In his 2008 book ''A Thousand Hills: Rwanda's Rebirth and the Man who Dreamed It'', Kinzer credits [[President of Rwanda|President]] [[Paul Kagame]] for what he calls the peace, development, and stability in [[Rwanda]] in the years after the [[Rwandan genocide]], and criticizes Rwanda's leaders before the genocide, such as [[Juvenal Habyarimana]].{{citation needed|date=December 2016}} According to [[Susan M. Thomson]], the "book is an exercise in public relations, aimed at further enhancing Kagame's stature in the eyes of the west", is one-sided due to heavy reliance on interviews with Kagame and even apologist.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Thomson |first1=Susan M. |title=Review of A Thousand Hills: Rwanda's Rebirth and the Man Who Dreamed It |journal=International Journal |date=2008 |volume=64 |issue=1 |pages=304–306 |doi=10.1177/002070200906400131 |jstor=40204478 |s2cid=146485596 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40204478 |issn=0020-7020|url-access=subscription }}</ref> In a 2016 opinion piece, Kinzer wrote that [[Aleppo]] had been liberated by [[Bashar al-Assad]]'s forces from the violent militants who had ruled it for three years, but that the American public had been told "convoluted nonsense" about the war. He added: "At the recent debate in Milwaukee, [[Hillary Clinton]] claimed that United Nations peace efforts in Syria were based on 'an agreement I negotiated in June of 2012 in Geneva.' The precise opposite is true. In 2012 Secretary of State Clinton joined [[Turkey]], [[Saudi Arabia]], and [[Israel]] in a successful effort to kill [[Kofi Annan]]'s UN peace plan because it would have accommodated [[Iran]] and kept Assad in power, at least temporarily. No one on the Milwaukee stage knew enough to challenge her."<ref>[https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/02/18/the-media-are-misleading-public-syria/8YB75otYirPzUCnlwaVtcK/story.html The media are misleading the public on Syria], February 18, 2016, ''[[The Boston Globe]]''</ref> In April 2018, he added: {{Quote|According to the logic behind American strategy in the Middle East—and the rest of the world—one of our principal goals should be to prevent peace or prosperity from breaking out in countries whose governments are unfriendly to us. That outcome in Syria would have results we consider intolerable.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2018/04/12/the-doesn-even-care-about-syria-but-keep-war-going/8zj7aaBaOPltRApGzgyd9H/story.html|title=The US doesn't even care about Syria — but we keep the war going |first=Stephen| last=Kinzer|work=The Boston Globe}}</ref>}}Kinzer wrote that the [[2018 Douma chemical attack|2018 Syrian Gas Attacks]] on Civilians in the Douma region was a "false flag" attack, suggesting the event was staged by either al-Qaeda, NATO, or Syrian Civil Defense.<ref>{{cite tweet |title=In case you fell for this one: chemical weapons monitors conclude that famous 2018 gas attack in #Syria was not an #Assad bombing--evidence shows "only plausible explanation" is "manual placement" by folks on the ground (al-Qaeda/#NATO/White Helmets) |user=stephenkinzer |number=1129906333128568834 |date=2019-05-18 |access-date=2023-05-05 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Kinzer |first=Stephen |date=April 27, 2018 |title=Hoisting the false flag |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2018/04/27/hoisting-false-flag/hRC63gFcq1zMUmd8UObqLM/story.html |access-date=2023-05-05 |website=BostonGlobe.com |language=en-US}}</ref> Kinzer has opposed US support for Ukraine in response to the [[2014 Russian invasion of Ukraine|2014]] and [[Russian invasion of Ukraine|2022]] Russian invasions, stating that the war is a [[proxy war]] provoked by [[NATO expansion]].<ref>{{cite news |first=Stephen |last=Kinzer |date=March 9, 2023 |title=The incalculable moral cost of proxy wars |newspaper=Boston Globe |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/03/09/opinion/incalculable-moral-cost-proxy-wars/ |access-date=2023-05-05}}</ref> Kinzer said in March 2022, after Russia's initial invasion, that US provision of arms to Ukraine only "guarantees more suffering and death" and that it "provoke[s] Russia to respond by killing more Ukrainians."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kinzer |first=Stephen |date=2022-03-18 |title=US military aid to Ukraine guarantees more suffering and death |url=https://stephenkinzer.com/2022/03/us-military-aid-to-ukraine-guarantees-more-suffering-and-death/ |access-date=2023-05-05 |website=StephenKinzer.com |language=en-US}}</ref> Kinzer believes that "for American strategic planners, this war has little to do with Ukraine. They see it as a battering ram against Russia. Since saving Ukrainian lives is not their priority, they view diplomacy as an enemy."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kinzer |first=Stephen |date=2022-07-11 |title=Biden moves US closer to confrontation with Russia |url=https://stephenkinzer.com/2022/07/biden-moves-us-closer-to-confrontation-with-russia/ |access-date=2023-05-05 |website=StephenKinzer.com |language=en-US}}</ref> Kinzer has rejected the "villainous" depiction of [[Vladimir Putin]], stating: "For years, we reveled in our moral superiority over colorful nemeses like [[Fidel Castro|Castro]], [[Muammar Gaddafi|Khadafi]], and [[Saddam Hussein]]. Putin fits perfectly into this constellation."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kinzer |first=Stephen |date=2023-02-22 |title=Putin & Zelensky: Sinners and saints who fit our historic narrative |url=http://stephenkinzer.com/2023/02/putin-zelensky-sinners-and-saints-who-fit-our-historic-narrative/ |access-date=2023-05-05 |website=StephenKinzer.com |language=en-US}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)