Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Strategic depth
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==In reference to Pakistan== {{Main|Geography of Pakistan|Pakistan-Afghanistan}} In Pakistan, the idea of strategic depth was perceived in 1980s by the [[National Defence University, Pakistan]], professor General [[Mirza Aslam Beg]] (later [[Chief of Army Staff (Pakistan)|Chief of Army Staff]] working under [[Prime Minister of Pakistan|Prime Minister]] [[Benazir Bhutto]] in 1980s).<ref name="DIIS"/> Since then, the [[Pakistan military]] establishment has been repeatedly accused of forming a policy that seeks to control [[Afghanistan]], a policy often referred to by the media as "strategic depth", which is used as the reason for Pakistan's support of certain factions of the [[Taliban]] in Afghanistan.<ref name="Parkes pp. 297β309">{{cite journal | last=Parkes | first=Aidan | title=Considered Chaos: Revisiting Pakistan's 'Strategic Depth' in Afghanistan | journal=Strategic Analysis | publisher=Informa UK Limited | volume=43 | issue=4 | date=2019-06-09 | issn=0970-0161 | doi=10.1080/09700161.2019.1625512 | pages=297β309| s2cid=195458519 }}</ref> In the years 2014β2015, with [[Operation Zarb-e-Azb|Pakistan's domestic operation against militants]] in full swing, Pakistani military leaders said that they adhered to no such policy.<ref name=FelbabBrown1>[http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2015/05/14-pakistan-afghanistan-regional-politics-felbabbrown Pakistanβs relations with Afghanistan and implications for regional politics] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160715032426/http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2015/05/14-pakistan-afghanistan-regional-politics-felbabbrown |date=2016-07-15 }} - [[Vanda Felbab-Brown]], 14 May 2015, [[Brookings Institution]]</ref> ===Accusations against the Pakistan military=== The term "strategic depth" has been used in reference to [[Pakistan]]'s utilization and contact with [[Afghanistan]] following the neighboring country's [[Soviet invasion of Afghanistan|Soviet intervention]], to prevent encirclement from a hostile [[India]] and a [[USSR]]-supported Afghanistan.<ref name="DIIS">{{cite web|url=http://www.diis.dk/graphics/Publications/Reports2011/RP2011-08-Pakistans-future-policy_web.pdf|title=Pakistan's future policy towards Afghanistan|last=Siddique|first=Qandeel|work=Danish Institute for International Studies|access-date=3 October 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111105160647/http://www.diis.dk/graphics/Publications/Reports2011/RP2011-08-Pakistans-future-policy_web.pdf|archive-date=5 November 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> Some sources state that the policy to control Afghanistan was formulated by [[National Defense University, Islamabad|NDU]] professor, General [[Mirza Aslam Beg]],<ref name="TSR20100517">{{cite web|url=http://bellum.stanfordreview.org/?p=2184|title=The Afghan Taliban and Pakistan's 'Strategic Depth'|date=17 May 2010|work=[[The Stanford Review]]|access-date=3 October 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101108184525/http://bellum.stanfordreview.org/?p=2184|archive-date=8 November 2010|url-status=dead}}</ref> and an Indian source claims this was continued as an active policy by the [[Pakistan Armed Forces]] until the policy was "de jure abolished in 1998 and de facto abolished in 2001", period when General [[Pervez Musharraf]] was the [[Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee|Chairman joint chiefs]].<ref name="Hindu">{{cite news|url=http://www.hindu.com/2001/11/07/stories/05072523.htm|title=Strategic depth in Afghanistan|date=1 November 2001|access-date=3 October 2011|last1=Raghavan|first1=V. R.|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111017211658/http://www.hindu.com/2001/11/07/stories/05072523.htm|archive-date=17 October 2011|newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|url-status=dead}}</ref> According to [[Richard G. Olson|Richard Olson]], [[U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan]], Pakistan military's doctrine of "strategic depth" is a concept in which Pakistan uses Afghanistan as an instrument of strategic security in ongoing tensions with [[India]] by attempting to control Afghanistan as a pawn for its own political purposes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://afpak.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/08/07/the_elusive_alliance|title=The elusive alliance|last=Imtiaz|first=Gul|date=7 August 2012|work=Foreign Policy|access-date=7 August 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120808230145/http://afpak.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/08/07/the_elusive_alliance|archive-date=8 August 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> It has been speculated that the [[Pakistan military]]'s "strategic depth" policy is either military or non-military in nature. The military version would state that the Pakistan military wishes to use Afghan territory as a "strategic rallying point" where they can, in the event of a successful Indian attack, retreat to and re-group for a counter-attack. The non-military version would be based on the idea that Pakistan can improve relations with other Islamic countries and [[former Soviet states]] such as [[Uzbekistan]] and [[Kazakhstan]], developing improved economic and cultural ties with them and thus making them into strong allies against India.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.opendemocracy.net/opensecurity/aziz-hakimi/af-pak-what-strategic-depth|title=Af-Pak: what is strategic depth?|last=Hakimi|first=Aziz|date=4 February 2010|publisher=opendemocracy.net|access-date=20 October 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110816004718/http://www.opendemocracy.net/opensecurity/aziz-hakimi/af-pak-what-strategic-depth|archive-date=16 August 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> ===View of the Pakistan military=== The former chief of army staff General [[Ashfaq Pervez Kayani|Ashfaq Kayani]] and previously the director-general of the [[Inter-Services Intelligence|ISI]], has repeatedly stated to the media that the Pakistan armed force's "strategic depth" policy with regards to Afghanistan is not to "control" Afghanistan but to ensure a "peaceful, friendly and stable" [[Pakistan - Afghanistan relations|relationship]] with Afghanistan. This policy therefore aims to ensure that Pakistan will not be threatened with long-term security problems on its [[Durand Line|Western border]] with Afghanistan.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://archives.dawn.com/archives/29601|title=Kayani speaks|date=3 February 2010|work=Dawn|access-date=20 October 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110415052016/http://archives.dawn.com/archives/29601|archive-date=15 April 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> According to Kayani, a 'talibanised' Afghanistan is not in Pakistan's interests.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thenews.com.pk/blog/blog_details.asp?id=461|title='Talibanised' Afghanistan not in Pakistan's interest: Kayani|date=3 February 2010|work=The News|location=Pakistan|access-date=20 October 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111204050015/http://www.thenews.com.pk/blog/blog_details.asp?id=461|archive-date=4 December 2011|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Parkes 2019 pp. 254β274">{{cite journal | last=Parkes | first=Aidan | title=Pakistan's Strategic Culture and its Gordian Knot in Afghanistan | journal=Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs | publisher=SAGE Publications | volume=6 | issue=3 | year=2019 | issn=2347-7970 | doi=10.1177/2347797019885728 | pages=254β274| s2cid=213418379 }}</ref> According to Ejaz Haider, a Pakistani military journalist, there is a confusion in the media regarding the policy on using Afghan territory to as a fallback area for Pakistan military assets. Haider blames General [[Mirza Aslam Beg]] for proposing this when he was the chief of army staff of the Pakistan Army under [[Prime Minister of Pakistan|Prime Minister]] [[Benazir Bhutto]], stating that this concept "was unpopular even when he was the chief and it has never been entertained by serious military planners. No one thinks of placing military and other assets in Afghanistan and thus acquiring strategic depth." Haider states that such a concept has always been impossible "for a host of reasons" and strategic depth is better used to describe achieving security through improving relationships with the governments of neighbouring countries such as Afghanistan and India.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/268921/pakistan-needs-strategic-depth/|title=Pakistan needs strategic depth|last=Haider|first=Ejaz|date=7 October 2011|work=The Express Tribune|access-date=20 October 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111026074304/http://tribune.com.pk/story/268921/pakistan-needs-strategic-depth/|archive-date=26 October 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> Lieutenant-General [[Asad Durrani]] of ISI, has rubbished claims in the media regarding Pakistan intending to use Afghan territory as "strategic depth". He also denies accusations that the Pakistan military has tried to "install a friendly government in Kabul" in order to "secure this depth". He gives the Soviet Union as an example, stating that "after the [[Saur Revolution]], the Soviets executed an installed president every three months in pursuit of that objective" and these policies later resulted in the defeat of the Soviets in Afghanistan. He argues that the notion of Pakistan using Afghan territory for its own purposes is a "distortion of a concept or of history" and is being used to vilify Pakistan.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://tribune.com.pk/story/277418/strategic-depth--revisited/|title=Strategic depth β revisited|last=Lt-Gen (r) Asad Durrani|date=19 October 2011|work=The Express Tribune|access-date=20 October 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111021142919/http://tribune.com.pk/story/277418/strategic-depth--revisited/|archive-date=21 October 2011|url-status=live}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)