Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Surface-conduction electron-emitter display
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== [[Canon Inc.|Canon]] began SED research in 1986.<ref name=stand>{{cite web|first=Peter |last=Putman |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060421141433/http://www.hdtvexpert.com/pages_b/sedtech.html |title=Standing in the shadows| publisher=HDTVexpert| date=8 March 2006| url=http://www.hdtvexpert.com/pages_b/sedtech.html |archive-date=21 April 2006 |url-status=usurped}}</ref> Their early research used PdO electrodes without the carbon films on top, but controlling the slit width proved difficult. At the time there were a number of flat-screen technologies in early development, and the only one close to commercialization was the [[plasma display panel]] (PDP), which had numerous disadvantages β manufacturing cost and energy use among them. LCDs were not suitable for larger screen sizes due to low yields and complex manufacturing. In 2004 Canon signed an agreement with [[Toshiba]] to create a joint venture to continue development of SED technology, forming "SED Ltd." Toshiba introduced new technology to pattern the conductors underlying the emitters using technologies adapted from inkjet printers. At the time both companies claimed that production was slated to begin in 2005. Both Canon and Toshiba started displaying prototype units at [[trade show]]s during 2006, including 55" and 36" units from Canon, and a 42" unit from Toshiba. They were widely lauded in the press for their image quality, saying it was "something that must be seen to believe[d]."<ref name=nguyen/> However, by this point Canon's SED introduction date had already slipped several times. It was first claimed it would go into production in 1999. This was pushed back to 2005 after the joint agreement, and then again into 2007 after the first demonstrations at CES and other shows. In October 2006, Toshiba's president announced the company plans to begin full production of 55-inch SED TVs in July 2007 at its recently built SED volume-production facility in [[Himeji, HyΕgo|Himeji]].<ref name="production">{{cite web|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,127365-c,tv/article.html|title=Toshiba eyes mass SED TV output in early '08|publisher=MarketWatch, Inc.|date=2006-06-20|access-date=2006-09-29|archive-date=2007-12-19|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071219030013/http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,127365-c,tv/article.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> In December 2006, Toshiba President and Chief Executive Atsutoshi Nishida said Toshiba was on track to mass-produce SED TV sets in cooperation with Canon by 2008. He said the company planned to start small-output production in the fall of 2007,<ref name="production2">{{cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB116672776608256958|title=Toshiba, Canon work on displays|publisher=Dow Jones & Company, Inc.|date=2006-12-22|access-date=2006-12-22|first=Yun-Hee|last=Kim|archive-date=2016-03-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308103859/http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB116672776608256958|url-status=live}}</ref> but they do not expect SED displays to become a commodity and will not release the technology to the consumer market because of its expected high price, reserving it solely for professional broadcasting applications.<ref name=nikkeibp>{{cite web|url=http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20061225/125850/|title=SED Won't Become Commodity -- Toshiba's President Nishida Said at Year-End Press Gathering|first=Masao|last=Oonishi|date=25 December 2006|publisher=Nikkei Microdevices|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070103123633/http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20061225/125850/|archive-date=3 January 2007|url-status=dead}}</ref> Also, in December 2006 it was revealed that one reason for the delay was a lawsuit brought against Canon by [[Applied Nanotech]]. On 25 May 2007, Canon announced that the prolonged litigation would postpone the launch of SED televisions, and a new launch date would be announced at some date in the future.<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.canon.com/news/2007/may25e.html|title=Notice Regarding Launch of SED TVs|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071214203129/http://www.canon.com/news/2007/may25e.html|archive-date=14 December 2007|url-status=dead|publisher=Canon Inc.|date=25 May 2007}}</ref> Applied Nanotech, a subsidiary of [[Nano-Proprietary]], holds a number of patents related to FED and SED manufacturing. They had sold Canon a perpetual license for a coating technology used in their newer carbon-based emitter structure. Applied Nanotech claimed that Canon's agreement with Toshiba amounted to an illegal technology transfer, and a separate agreement would have to be reached. They first approached the problem in April 2005.<ref name=ft>{{cite web|first=Robin|last=Harding|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/577ed3f0-c011-11dd-9222-0000779fd18c.html|title=Canon clear to launch new type of TV|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090213033634/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/577ed3f0-c011-11dd-9222-0000779fd18c.html |archive-date=13 February 2009|publisher=Financial Times|date=2 December 2008|url-status=dead}}</ref> Canon responded to the lawsuit with several actions. On 12 January 2007 they announced that they would buy all of Toshiba's shares in SED Inc. in order to eliminate Toshiba's involvement in the venture.<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.canon.com/press/2007/sed2007jan12.html |title=SED Inc. to become wholly owned subsidiary of Canon Inc |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070114200749/http://www.canon.com/press/2007/sed2007jan12.html |archive-date=14 January 2007| publisher=Canon Inc. |date=12 January 2007|url-status=dead}}</ref> They also started re-working their existing RE40,062 patent filing in order to remove any of Applied Nanotech's technologies from their system. The modified patent was issued on 12 February 2008.<ref>RE40,062</ref> On 22 February 2007, the [[U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas]], a district widely known for agreeing with patent holders in [[intellectual property]] cases, ruled in a summary judgment that Canon had violated its agreement by forming a joint television venture with Toshiba.<ref name="summaryjudgement">{{cite web|url=http://news.cnet.com/2100-1047_3-6161591.html?part=rss&tag=2547-1_3-0-5&subj=news|title=Judge rules against Canon in nanotube TV case|publisher=CNET|date=2007-02-22|access-date=2013-08-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070225070743/http://news.cnet.com/2100-1047_3-6161591.html|archive-date=2007-02-25}}</ref> However, on 2 May 2007 a jury ruled that no additional damages beyond the $5.5m fee for the original licensing contract were due.<ref name="courtruling">{{cite web|url=http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=247962|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201109022056/http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=247962|url-status=dead|archive-date=November 9, 2020|title=Nano-Proprietary, Inc. Announces Verdict in Canon Litigation|date=2007-05-03|access-date=2007-05-06}} </ref><ref name="courtrulingcanonpr">{{cite web|url=http://www.canon.com/press/2007/sed2007may4.html|title=Notice Regarding Litigation with Nano-Proprietary Involving SED|date=2007-05-07|access-date=2007-05-07 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070509034217/http://www.canon.com/press/2007/sed2007may4.html <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 2007-05-09}}</ref> On 25 July 2008, the [[U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit]] reversed the lower court's decision and provided that Canon's "irrevocable and perpetual" non-exclusive licence was still enforceable and covers Canon's restructured subsidiary SED.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/07/07-50640-CV0.wpd.pdf|title=Appeal's Court Ruling on No. 07-50640|access-date=2008-07-30|archive-date=2011-06-13|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110613180220/http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/07/07-50640-CV0.wpd.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> On 2 December 2008, Applied Nanotech dropped the lawsuit, stating that continuing the lawsuit "would probably be a futile effort".<ref name=ft/> In spite of legal success, Canon announced at the same time that the [[Great Recession]] was making introduction of the sets far from certain, going so far as to say it would not be launching the product at that time "because people would laugh at them".<ref name=ft/> Canon also had an ongoing OLED development process that started in the midst of the lawsuit. In 2007 they announced a joint deal to form "Hitachi Displays Ltd.", with [[Panasonic Corporation|Matsushita]] and Canon each taking a 24.9% share of [[Hitachi]]'s existing subsidiary. Canon later announced that they were purchasing Tokki Corp, a maker of OLED fabrication equipment.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUST9225920071113|title=Canon to take majority stake in Tokki for $69 mln |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308134142/https://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUST9225920071113 |archive-date=8 March 2021|publisher=Reuters|date=13 November 2007|url-status=live}}</ref> In April 2009 during NAB 2009, Peter Putman was quoted as saying "I was asked on more than one occasion about the chances of Canon's SED making a comeback, something I would not have bet money on after the Nano Technologies licensing debacle. However, a source within Canon told me at the show that the SED is still very much alive as a pro monitor technology. Indeed, a Canon SED engineer from Japan was quietly making the rounds in the Las Vegas Convention Center to scope out the competition."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://displaydaily.com/2009/04/27/nab-2009-the-season-of-their-discontent/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090502150404/http://displaydaily.com/2009/04/27/nab-2009-the-season-of-their-discontent |url-status=dead |archive-date=2009-05-02 |title=NAB 2009: The Season Of Their Discontent |date=2009-04-27 |access-date=2009-04-27 }}</ref> Canon officially announced on 25 May 2010 the end of the development of SED TVs for the home consumer market,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64O03I20100525 |title=Canon to freeze development of home-use SED TVs |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201109023613/https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64O03I20100525 |archive-date=9 November 2020|publisher=Reuters|date=25 May 2010|url-status=live}}</ref> but indicated that they will continue development for commercial applications like medical equipment. On 18 August 2010, Canon decided to liquidate SED Inc.,<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.canon.com/news/2010/aug18e.html |title=Notice regarding liquidation of subsidiary |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120510081954/http://www.canon.com/news/2010/aug18e.html |archive-date=10 May 2012 |publisher=Canon Inc. |date=18 August 2010}}</ref> a consolidated subsidiary of Canon Inc. developing SED technology, citing difficulties to secure appropriate profitability and effectively ending hopes to one day see SED TVs in the home or the room or the living room.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)