Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Synchronization gear
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Components == A typical synchronizing gear had three basic components. === At the propeller === [[File:Severed propeller blade.jpg|thumb|Propeller of an Albatros C.III. One blade severed by a faulty or badly adjusted synchronization gear]] First, a method of determining the position of the propeller at a given instant was required. Typically, a [[Cam (mechanism)|cam]], driven either directly from the propeller shaft itself, or from some part of the drive train revolving at the same speed as the propeller, generated a series of impulses at the same rate as the propeller's revolutions.<ref name=Volker2p78/> There were exceptions to this. Some gears placed the cam within the gun trigger mechanism itself, and the firing impulses were sometimes timed to occur at every two or three revolutions of the propeller, or, especially in the case of hydraulic or electric gears, at the rate of two or more for each revolution. The diagrams in this section assume, for simplicity's sake, one impulse for one revolution, so that each synchronized round is "aimed" at a single spot on the propeller disc. [[File:Synchronised gun - catastrophic failure.svg|thumb|upright|Synchronised gun firing badly "out of sync". All or most rounds strike one blade of propeller, quickly destroying it]] The timing of each impulse had to be adjusted to coincide with a "safe" period, when the blades of the propeller were well out of the way, and this adjustment had to be checked at intervals, especially if the propeller was changed or refitted, as well as after a major engine overhaul. Faults in this adjustment (for example, a cam wheel slipping a millimetre or two, or a pushrod flexing)<ref group="Note">The normal expansion and contraction due to changing temperature was quite enough, especially for longer rods.</ref> could well result in ''every'' bullet fired hitting the propeller, a worse result than if the gun was fired through the propeller with no control at all. The other main type of failure resulted in fewer or no firing impulses, usually due to the generator or linkages either jamming or breaking. This was a common cause of synchronized guns "jamming". The speed of the propeller, and thus the distance that it travelled between the firing of the gun and the arrival of the bullet at the propeller disc, varied as the rate of engine revolutions changed. Where muzzle velocity was very high, and the guns were sited well forward so that the bullets had a very short distance to reach the disc of the propeller, this difference could be largely ignored. But in the case of relatively low muzzle velocity weapons, or any gun sited well back from the propeller, the question could become critical,<ref name=Volker4p60>Volker 1992, pt. 4, p. 60</ref> and in some cases the pilot had to consult his tachometer, taking care that his engine revolutions were within a "safe" range before firing, otherwise risking speedy destruction of his propeller.<ref group="Note">This phenomenon was particularly marked in Austro-Hungarian fighters armed with the [[Schwarzlose MG M.07/12|Schwarzlose gun]]: which had a low muzzle velocity and very marginal suitability for synchronization.</ref> === At the gun === [[File:Synchronised gun - unsuitable gun or amunition.svg|thumb|left|180px|An attempt to synchronise an unsuitable gun or faulty/disparate ammunition – "rogue" shots – some of which risk striking the propeller.]] The second requirement was for a gun that would reliably fire (or hold its fire) exactly when required. Not all automatic weapons were equally amenable to synchronization. When it was ready to fire, a synchronized machine-gun needed to have a round in the breech, the breech closed, and the action cocked (the so-called "[[closed bolt]]" position).<ref name=Volker3p52>Volker 1992, pt. 3, p. 52</ref> Several widely used automatic weapons (notably the [[Lewis gun]] and the Italian [[Fiat–Revelli Modello 1914|Revelli]]) were triggered from an [[open bolt]], with an unpredictable interval between triggering and firing,<ref name=Williams1.34>Williams 2003, p. 34.</ref> and were thus not suitable for synchronization without extensive modification.<ref name=Woodman4a>Woodman 1989, pp. 176–177.</ref> In practice it was found necessary for the gun to be fired in [[semi-automatic firearm|semi-automatic]] mode.<ref name=Volker2p79>Volker 1992, pt. 2, p. 79</ref> As the propeller revolved, a series of firing impulses was transmitted to the gun, each of which could trigger it to fire a single shot. The majority of these impulses would catch the gun in the process of ejecting a spent round or loading a fresh one, and would thus have no effect; but as soon as the firing cycle was completed, the gun would be ready to fire as soon as it received the next impulse from the synchronizing gear. The delay between the end of the firing cycle and the arrival of the next firing impulse slowed the rate of fire in comparison with a free-firing machine gun, which fires the moment it is ready to do so; but provided the gear functioned correctly, the gun could fire fairly rapidly between the whirling propeller blades without striking them.<ref name=Volker2p78>Volker 1992, pt. 2, p. 78</ref> Some other machine-guns, such as the Austrian [[Schwarzlose MG M.07/12|Schwarzlose]] and the American [[M1895 Colt-Browning machine gun#World War I|Marlin]], proved less than perfectly adapted to synchronization, although eventually predictable "single shot" firing was achieved, typically by modifying the trigger mechanism to emulate "closed bolt" firing. Most weapons that were successfully synchronized (at least in the First World War period) were (like the German [[Parabellum MG 14/17|Parabellum]] and [[Maschinengewehr 08|Spandau]] guns and the British [[Vickers machine gun|Vickers]]) based on the original [[Maxim gun]] of 1884, a closed bolt weapon operated by barrel recoil.<ref name=Williams1.16>Williams 2003, pp. 16–17.</ref> Before these distinctions were fully understood, much time was wasted on attempts to synchronize unsuitable weapons.<ref name=Volker1p48/> Even a closed bolt weapon needed reliable ammunition.<ref name=BAP11>Bureau of Aircraft Production 1918, p. 11.</ref> If the [[Primer (firearms)|primer]] in a cartridge is faulty to the extent of delaying the firing of the gun for a tiny fraction of a second (quite a common case in practice with mass-produced ammunition) this is of little consequence in the case of a gun in use by infantry on the ground, but in the case of a synchronized "aircraft" gun such a delay can produce a rogue firing, sufficiently "out of time" for it to risk hitting the propeller.<ref name=Williams1.35>Williams 2003, p. 35.</ref> A very similar problem could arise where the mass of a special round (such as an incendiary or explosive one) was different enough to produce a substantial difference in muzzle velocity.<ref name=Robertson105>Robertson 1970, p.105</ref> This was compounded by the additional risk to the integrity of the propeller due to the nature of the round. The "trigger motor" could theoretically take two forms. The earliest patent (Schneider 1913) assumed that the synchronization gear would periodically ''prevent the gun from firing'', thus operating as a true, or literal "interrupter". In practice all "real-life" synchronization gears, for which we have reliable technical details, directly ''fired the gun'': operating it as if it were a semi-automatic weapon rather than a completely automatic one. === The linkage between propeller and gun === The third requirement is for a linkage between the "machines" (engine and gun) to be synchronized. Many early gears used an intricate and inherently fragile bell crank and push rod linkage that could easily jam or otherwise malfunction, especially when required to work at higher speeds than it had been designed for. There were several alternative methods, including an oscillating rod, a flexible drive, a column of hydraulic fluid, a cable, or an electrical connection. Generally, mechanical systems were inferior to hydraulic or electric ones, but none were ever entirely foolproof, and synchronization gears at best always remained liable to occasional failure. The ''[[Luftwaffe]]'' ace [[Adolf Galland]] in his memoir of the war period ''The First and the Last'' describes a serious faulty synchronization incident in 1941.<ref name=Galland1>Galland 1955, p. 219.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)