Editing Terms of service (section)

==Content==
A terms of service agreement typically contains sections pertaining to one or more of the following topics:

*Disambiguation/definition of keywords and phrases
*User rights and responsibilities
**Proper or expected usage; definition of misuse
**Accountability for online actions, behavior, and conduct
**[[Privacy policy]] outlining the use of personal data
**Payment details such as membership or subscription fees, etc.
**[[Opt-out]] policy describing procedure for account termination, if available
**Sometimes contains an [[Arbitration]] clause detailing the dispute resolution process and limited rights to take a claim to court 
*Disclaimer/Limitation of liability, clarifying the site's legal liability for damages incurred by users
*User notification upon modification of terms, if offered

Among 102 companies marketing [[genetic testing]] to consumers in 2014 for health purposes, 71 had publicly available terms and conditions:<ref name="phillips">{{Cite book |last=Phillips |first=Andelka M. |title=2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops |chapter=Genomic Privacy and Direct-to-Consumer Genetics: Big Consumer Genetic Data -- What's in that Contract? |date=2015 |location=San Jose, CA |publisher=IEEE |pages=60–64 |doi=10.1109/SPW.2015.19 |isbn=9781479999330|hdl=2262/77428 |s2cid=14504403 |hdl-access=free }}p</ref>
*57 of the 71 had disclaimer clauses (including 10 disclaiming liability for injury caused by their own negligence)
*51 let the company change terms (including 17 without notice)
*34 allow data disclosure in certain circumstances
*31 require consumers to [[indemnify]] the company
*20 promise not to [[Data broker|sell data]]

Among 260 mass market consumer [[software license]] agreements in 2010:<ref name="w2010">{{Cite journal |last=Marotta-Wurgler |first=Florencia, and Robert Taylor |date=2013 |title=Set in Stone? Change and Innovation in Consumer Standard-Form Contracts |url=https://www.nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/NYULawReview-88-1-MarottaWurgler-Taylor.pdf |journal=New York University Law and Economics Working Papers |volume=88 |pages=240–285}}</ref>
*91% disclaimed warranties of merchantability or fitness for purpose or said it was "As is"
*92% disclaimed consequential, incidental, special or foreseeable damages
*69% did not warrant the software was free of defects or would work as described in the manual
*55% capped damages at the purchase price or less
*36% said they were not warranting whether it infringed others' intellectual property rights
*32% required arbitration or a specific court
*17% required the customer to pay legal bills of the maker (indemnification), but not vice versa

Among the terms and conditions of 31 [[Cloud computing|cloud-computing services]] in January-July 2010, operating in England:<ref name="qmul2">{{Cite web |last1=Bradshaw |first1=Simon |last2=Millard |first2=Christopher |last3=Walden |first3=Ian |date=2010-09-02 |title=Contracts for Clouds: Comparison and Analysis of the Terms and Conditions of Cloud Computing Services |url=https://www.claydesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/contracts-for-clouds-comparison-and-analysis.pdf |location=Rochester, NY |publisher=Queen Mary University of London - Cloud Legal Project}}</ref>
*27 specified the law to be used (a US state or other country)
*most specify that consumers can claim against the company only in a particular city in that jurisdiction, though often the company can claim against the consumer anywhere
*some require claims to be brought within half a year to 2 years
*7 impose arbitration, all forbid illegal and objectionable conduct by the consumer
*13 can amend terms just by posting changes on their own website
*a majority disclaim responsibility for confidentiality or backups
*most promise to preserve data only briefly after terminating service
*few promise to delete data thoroughly when the customer leaves
*some monitor the customers' data to enforce their policies on use
*all disclaim warranties and almost all disclaim liability
*24 require the customer to [[indemnity|indemnify]] them, a few indemnify the customer
*a few give credits for poor service, 15 promise "best efforts" and can suspend or stop at any time
The researchers note that rules on location and time limits may be unenforceable for consumers in many jurisdictions with [[consumer protection]]s, that acceptable use policies are rarely enforced, that quick deletion is dangerous if a court later rules the termination wrongful, that local laws often require warranties (and UK forced [[Apple Inc.|Apple]] to say so).