Editing Urban structure (section)

==Sectoral model==
{{main|Sector model}}

A second theory of urban structure was proposed in 1939 by an economist named [[Homer Hoyt]].<ref>Hoyt H (1939): "The structure and growth of residential neighborhoods in American cities" Washington DC; Federal Housing Administration</ref> His model, the sector model, proposed that a city develops in sectors instead of rings. Certain areas of a city are more attractive for various activities, whether by chance or geographic and environmental reasons. As the city grows and these activities flourish and expand outward, they do so in a wedge and become a sector of the city. If a district is set up for high income housing, for example, any new development in that district will expand from the outer edge.

To some degree this theory is just a refinement on the concentric model rather than a radical restatement.  Both Hoyt and Burgess claimed [[Chicago]] supported their model.  Burgess claimed that Chicago's central business district was surrounded by a series of rings, broken only by [[Lake Michigan]]. Hoyt argued that the best housing developed north from the central business district along Lake Michigan, while industry located along major rail lines and roads to the south, southwest, and northwest.

[[Calgary, Alberta]] almost perfectly fits Hoyt's sector model.