Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Virtual colonoscopy
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Advantages== VC may be more comfortable for some individuals, as it does not require the use of a colonoscope. As a result, no sedation is needed, and the patient can return to his/her usual activities or go home after the procedure without the aid of another person. The lack of sedation also lowers the risk of the procedure since some people may have adverse reactions to sedative medications used during conventional colonoscopy. VC provides clearer, more detailed images than a conventional x-ray using a [[barium enema]], sometimes called a lower gastrointestinal (GI) series. Further, about 1 in 10 patients will not have a complete right colon (cecum) evaluation completed with conventional colonoscopy.<ref name="pmid15666105">{{cite journal |author=Menardo G |title=Sensitivity of diagnostic examinations for colorectal polyps |journal=Tech Coloproctol |volume=8 |pages=s273β5 |date=December 2004 |issue=Suppl 2 |pmid=15666105 |doi=10.1007/s10151-004-0175-0|s2cid=12918901 }}</ref> It also takes less time than either a conventional colonoscopy or a lower GI series.<ref>[http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/virtual-colonoscopy/CO00025 Virtual Colonoscopy] - [[Mayo Clinic]]. "Virtual colonoscopy is typically faster than traditional colonoscopy. A scan of your colon takes about 10 minutes. Expect the entire virtual colonoscopy procedure to take 20 to 30 minutes."</ref> VC provides a secondary benefit of revealing diseases or abnormalities outside the colon.<ref name="pmid16040909">{{cite journal |author=Yee J |title=Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population |journal=Radiology |volume=236 |issue=2 |pages=519β26 |date=August 2005 |pmid=16040909 |doi=10.1148/radiol.2362040166 |url=http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=16040909 |access-date=2008-12-22 |name-list-style=vanc|author2=Kumar NN |author3=Godara S |display-authors=3 |last4=Casamina |first4=J. A. |last5=Hom |first5=R. |last6=Galdino |first6=G. |last7=Dell |first7=P. |last8=Liu |first8=D.|url-access=subscription }}</ref> One study of asymptomatic adults undergoing routine VC found that approximately one unsuspected extracolonic cancer was detected per 300 screenings in addition to about one invasive colorectal cancer per 500 screenings, for an overall rate of approximately one unsuspected cancer of any type detected per 200 screenings. Invasive colorectal cancer was the most common malignancy detected, followed by [[renal cell carcinoma]].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Pickhardt|first=Perry J.|date=April 2010|title=Colorectal and Extracolonic Cancers Detected at Screening CT Colonography in 10,286 Asymptomatic Adults|url=https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/pdf/10.1148/radiol.09090939|journal=Radiology|volume=255-1|issue=1 |pages=83β88|doi=10.1148/radiol.09090939 |pmid=20308446 |url-access=subscription}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)