Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Visual thinking
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Learning styles=== {{Main|Learning styles}} The acknowledgement and application of different cognitive and [[learning styles]], including visual, kinesthetic, musical, mathematical, and verbal thinking styles, are a common part of many current teacher training courses.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Reference: Crystal, D. (1997). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press. |url=https://www.bing.com/search?q=Reference:+Crystal,+D.+(1997).+The+Cambridge+Encyclopedia+of+Language.+Cambridge+University+Press.&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&lq=1&pq=&sc=10-0&sk=&cvid=037D96010C064BFAAB4B4796BD3B235C&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&ghpl= |access-date=2023-06-27 |website=Bing |language=en}}</ref> Those who think in pictures have generally claimed to be best at visual learning.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Reference: Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. |url=https://www.bing.com/search?q=Reference:+Paivio,+A.+(1971).+Imagery+and+verbal+processes.+Holt,+Rinehart+and+Winston.&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&lq=1&pq=reference:+paivio,+a.+(1971).+imagery+and+verbal+processes.+holt,+rinehart+and+winston.&sc=0-87&sk=&cvid=248BF322ED314707A120D2EBB580E3FB&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&ghpl= |access-date=2023-06-27 |website=Bing |language=en}}</ref> Empirical research shows that there is no evidence that identifying a student's "learning style" produces better outcomes. There is significant evidence that the widespread "meshing hypothesis", the assumption that a student will learn best if taught in a method deemed appropriate for the student's learning style, is not fully studied in proper detail.{{sfn|Pashler|2008}}{{sfn|Felder|2007}} “Of those that did use an appropriate method” of research, “several found results that flatly contradict the popular meshing hypothesis”.{{sfn|Pashler|2008}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)