Editing William Robertson Smith (section)

==Approach==
His views on the [[historical method]] of [[Biblical criticism|criticism]] can be illustrated in the following quote:
<blockquote>Ancient books coming down to us from a period many centuries before the invention of printing have necessarily [[Palaeography|undergone many vicissitudes]]. Some of them are preserved only in imperfect copies made by an ignorant scribe of the dark ages. Others have been disfigured by editors, who mixed up foreign matter with the original text. Very often an important book fell altogether out of sight for a long time, and when it came to light again all knowledge of its origin was gone; for old books did not generally have title-pages and prefaces. And, when such a nameless roll was again brought into notice, some half-informed reader or transcriber was not unlikely to give it a new title of his own devising, which was handed down thereafter as if it had been original. Or again, the true meaning and purpose of a book often became obscure in the lapse of centuries, and led to false interpretations. Once more, antiquity has handed down to us many writings which are sheer forgeries, like some of the [[Apocrypha|Apocryphal books]], or the [[Sibylline oracles]], or those famous ''[[Epistles of Phalaris]]'' which formed the subject of Bentley's great critical essay. In all such cases the [[Historical criticism|historical critic]] must destroy the received view, in order to [[Textual criticism|establish the truth]]. He must review doubtful titles, purge out interpolations, expose forgeries; but he does so only to manifest the truth, and exhibit the genuine remains of antiquity in their real character. A book that is really old and really valuable has nothing to fear from the critic, whose labours can only put its worth in a clearer light, and [[Diplomatics|establish its authority]] on a surer basis.<ref>''The Old Testament in the Jewish Church'' (1892), p. 17. Also cited in the Preface to [[Encyclopedia Biblica]].</ref></blockquote>