Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Perception management
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Foreign policy and terrorism== Perception management has long been a key issue in the United States government. Beginning in the 1950s, the CIA contracted out several hundred different public information and news agencies for different "assignments". This practice grew, and currently operates with several thousand initiatives helping to privately shape public opinion of the government. Indeed, the Department of Defense views perception management as a psychological operation aimed at eliciting the desired behavior by manipulating the opinions of both enemies and friends. Best put by the DOD directly, "Perception management combines truth projection, operations security, cover and deception, and psychological operations."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.towardfreedom.com/home/content/view/388/59/ |title=The evolution of perception management tactics (06/04) |publisher=Towardfreedom.com |date=2005-06-03 |access-date=2012-02-23}}</ref> Since the U.S. engaged in the [[War on Terror]], perception management tactics have become vital to military success and relations with other countries. {{blockquote|text= ... It is absolutely vital that the Perception Management campaign of the United States and its allies be coordinated at the highest possible level, that it be resourced adequately, and executed effectively. Properly coordinated, such a campaign could be a war-winning capability. When left uncoordinated, such operations will achieve only modest success, at best, and at worst, could seriously backfire. Even a poorly chosen word, used in the heat of the moment (e.g. 'crusade'), can have significant negative consequences.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Garfield, A.|year=2002|title=The Offence of Strategic Influence: Making the Case for Perception Management|journal=Journal of Information Warfare|volume=1|issue=3|publisher=School of Computer and Information Science, Edith Cowan University|location=Western Australia|access-date=2010-11-05|url=http://www.jinfowar.com/journals/archives/vol-1/v1-issue-3/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120320153533/http://www.jinfowar.com/journals/archives/vol-1/v1-issue-3/|url-status=dead|archive-date=2012-03-20|page=46}}</ref>}} Typical counter-terrorism (CT) thinking focuses on the violence, or its associated threat, to identify and exploit associated avenues for meaningful response and reaction.<ref>{{cite web|author=Gressang, D. S.|date=March 17, 2004|title=''Perception Management and Counter-terrorism: Leveraging the Communicative Dynamic'', paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada|access-date=2008-10-10|url=http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p73614_index.html}}{{dead link|date=March 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)