Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Natural transformation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Historical notes == [[Saunders Mac Lane]], one of the founders of category theory, is said to have remarked, "I didn't invent categories to study functors; I invented them to study natural transformations."<ref>{{harv|Mac Lane|1998|loc=Β§I.4}}</ref> Just as the study of [[group (mathematics)|groups]] is not complete without a study of [[group homomorphism|homomorphisms]], so the study of categories is not complete without the study of [[functor]]s. The reason for Mac Lane's comment is that the study of functors is itself not complete without the study of natural transformations. The context of Mac Lane's remark was the axiomatic theory of [[homology (mathematics)|homology]]. Different ways of constructing homology could be shown to coincide: for example in the case of a [[simplicial complex]] the groups defined directly would be isomorphic to those of the singular theory. What cannot easily be expressed without the language of natural transformations is how homology groups are compatible with morphisms between objects, and how two equivalent homology theories not only have the same homology groups, but also the same morphisms between those groups.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)