Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Price index
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Calculation methods == === Normalization === Indices are often normalized so the base period equals 100, with later values as percentages. For example, if 2010 = 100 and prices rise 5% by 2011, the index is 105, showing a 5% increase.<ref>Diewert (1993), 75–76.</ref> === Chained vs. unchained calculations === Unchained indices compare all periods to a fixed base (e.g., 2010), amplifying bias over time as quantities diverge. Chained indices update the base each period, calculating period-to-period changes (e.g., 2010 to 2011, 2011 to 2012) and multiplying them:<ref>ILO CPI manual</ref> : <math>P_{t_n} = \prod_{i=1}^{n} \frac{\sum (p_{c,t_i} \cdot q_{c,t_{i-1}})}{\sum (p_{c,t_{i-1}} \cdot q_{c,t_{i-1}})}</math> Chaining reduces bias (e.g., reflecting recent substitution) but requires more data and can drift if errors accumulate.<ref>ILO CPI manual</ref> === Relative ease of calculating the Laspeyres index === The Laspeyres index is simpler to compute than Paasche or bilateral indices because it fixes quantities at <math>t_0</math>, requiring only price updates (e.g., monthly price surveys) without new quantity or expenditure data each period. Paasche needs current quantities, and superlatives like Fisher demand both, increasing data and computational demands.<ref>Statistics New Zealand; ''Glossary of Common Terms'', [http://www2.stats.govt.nz/domino/external/omni/omni.nsf/wwwglsry/paasche+index "Paasche Index"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170518063121/http://www2.stats.govt.nz/domino/external/omni/omni.nsf/wwwglsry/paasche+index|date=2017-05-18}}</ref> === Calculating indices from expenditure data === Sometimes, especially for aggregate data, expenditure data (<math>E_{c,t} = p_{c,t} \cdot q_{c,t}</math>) are more readily available than quantity data. If expenditure and base prices are known, indices can be computed without direct quantities. For example, Laspeyres becomes:<ref>Statistics New Zealand; ''Glossary of Common Terms'', [http://www2.stats.govt.nz/domino/external/omni/omni.nsf/0/7d11773239ed84eecc256f350016b841?OpenDocument "Laspeyres Index"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120206210828/http://www2.stats.govt.nz/domino/external/omni/omni.nsf/0/7d11773239ed84eecc256f350016b841?OpenDocument|date=2012-02-06}}</ref> : <math>P_L = \frac{\sum (\frac{p_{c,t_n}}{p_{c,t_0}} \cdot E_{c,t_0})}{\sum E_{c,t_0}}</math> This uses expenditure shares and price relatives, a practical approach when quantities are hard to measure, though it retains Laspeyres’ fixed-weight assumptions.<ref>Statistics New Zealand; ''Glossary of Common Terms'', [http://www2.stats.govt.nz/domino/external/omni/omni.nsf/0/7d11773239ed84eecc256f350016b841?OpenDocument "Laspeyres Index"]</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)