Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Software patent
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Obviousness== A common objection to software patents is that they relate to trivial inventions.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2005/jun/20/comment.comment|work=The Guardian|location=London|title=Patent absurdity|date=June 20, 2005|access-date=May 23, 2010|first=Richard|last=Stallman}}</ref> A patent on an invention that many people would easily develop independently of one another should not, it is argued, be granted since this impedes development. Different countries have different ways of dealing with the question of [[inventive step and non-obviousness]] in relation to software patents. Europe uses an 'Inventive step test'; see the [[Inventive step under the European Patent Convention|Inventive step requirement in Europe]] and, for instance, [[T 258/03]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)