Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Situated cognition
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Considerations=== However, it is important to remember that a theory is neither wrong nor right but provides affordances for certain aspects of a problem.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Sfard | first1 = A|author1-link=Anna Sfard | s2cid = 135448246 | year = 1998 | title = On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one | journal = Educational Researcher| volume = 27 | issue = 2| pages = 4β13 | doi=10.3102/0013189x027002004}}</ref> Lave and Wenger recognized this in their ironic comment, "How can we purport to be working out a theoretical conception of learning without engaging in the project of abstraction [decontextualized knowledge] rejected above?" (Lave & Wenger, 1991, p. 38).
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)