Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Streaming media
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Greenhouse gas emissions === {{main|Greenhouse gas emissions#Digital services}} The net [[greenhouse gas emissions]] from streaming music were estimated at between 0.2 and 0.35 million metric tons [[Co2eq|CO2eq]] (between {{Convert|0.2 and 0.35|e6t|disp=out}}) per year in the [[Greenhouse gas emissions by the United States|United States]], by a 2019 study.<ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/environmental-impact-streaming-music-835220/|title=Is Streaming Music Dangerous to the Environment? One Researcher Is Sounding the Alarm|last=Blistein|first=Jon|date=23 May 2019|magazine=[[Rolling Stone]]|access-date=3 August 2019}}</ref> This was an increase from emissions in the pre-digital music period, which were estimated at "{{Convert|0.14|e6t|sp=us}} in 1977, 0.136 million ({{Convert|0.136|e6t|disp=out}}) in 1988, and 0.157 million ({{Convert|0.157|e6t|disp=out}}) in 2000."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.gla.ac.uk/news/headline_643297_en.html|title=Music consumption has unintended economic and environmental costs|date=8 April 2019|publisher=The University of Glasgow|access-date=3 August 2019|archive-date=3 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190803131017/https://www.gla.ac.uk/news/headline_643297_en.html|url-status=live}}</ref> However, this is far less than other everyday activities such as eating. For example [[Greenhouse gas emissions by the United States|greenhouse gas emissions in the United States]] from beef cattle ([[Burping|burping of ruminants]] only - not including their [[manure]]) were {{Convert|129|e6t|e6LT e6ST|abbr=none|sp=us}} in 2019.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Greenhouse Gas Inventory Data Explorer {{!}} US EPA |url=https://cfpub.epa.gov/ghgdata/inventoryexplorer/#iagriculture/entericfermentation/allgas/animal/all |access-date=2022-03-09 |website=cfpub.epa.gov |language=en |archive-date=9 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220309221056/https://cfpub.epa.gov/ghgdata/inventoryexplorer/#iagriculture/entericfermentation/allgas/animal/all |url-status=live }}</ref> A 2021 study claimed that, based on the amount of data transmitted, one hour of streaming or videoconferencing "emits {{Convert|150-1,000|g|4=0|sp=us}} of carbon dioxide ... requires {{Convert|2-12|L|4=1|sp=us}} of water and demands a land area adding up to about the size of an [[iPad Mini]]." The study suggests that turning the camera off during video calls can reduce the greenhouse gas and water use footprints by 96%, and that an 86% reduction is possible by using standard definition rather than high definition when streaming content with apps such as [[Netflix]] or [[Hulu]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Turn off that camera during virtual meetings, environmental study says: Simple tips to go green with your internet use during a pandemic|url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/01/210114134033.htm|access-date=2021-01-16|website=ScienceDaily|language=en|archive-date=17 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210117025114/https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/01/210114134033.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Obringer |first1=Renee |last2=Rachunok |first2=Benjamin |last3=Maia-Silva |first3=Debora |last4=Arbabzadeh |first4=Maryam |last5=Nateghi |first5=Roshanak |last6=Madani |first6=Kaveh |title=The overlooked environmental footprint of increasing Internet use |journal=Resources, Conservation and Recycling |date=April 2021 |volume=167 |pages=105389 |doi=10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105389|bibcode=2021RCR...16705389O |s2cid=233072553 }}</ref> However, another study estimated a relatively low amount of {{Convert|36|g/hour|oz/hour|abbr=off}}, and concluded that watching a Netflix video for half an hour emitted only the same amount as driving a gasoline-fuelled car for about {{Convert|100|m|sp=us}}, so not a significant amount.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The carbon footprint of streaming video: fact-checking the headlines β Analysis |url=https://www.iea.org/commentaries/the-carbon-footprint-of-streaming-video-fact-checking-the-headlines |access-date=2022-03-09 |website=IEA |date=11 December 2020 |language=en-GB |archive-date=21 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220321235339/https://www.iea.org/commentaries/the-carbon-footprint-of-streaming-video-fact-checking-the-headlines |url-status=live }}</ref> One way to decrease greenhouse gas emissions associated with streaming music is to make [[data center]]s [[Carbon neutrality|carbon neutral]] by converting to electricity produced from [[Renewable energy|renewable sources]]. On an individual level, the purchase of a physical CD may be more environmentally friendly if it is to be played more than 27 times.<ref name=EnvironmentalImpact>{{Cite web|url=http://theconversation.com/the-environmental-impact-of-music-digital-records-cds-analysed-108942|title=The environmental impact of music: digital, records, CDs analysed|last1=McKay|first1=Deirdre|last2=George|first2=Sharon|date=10 January 2019|website=The Conversation|access-date=3 August 2019|archive-date=3 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190803131015/http://theconversation.com/the-environmental-impact-of-music-digital-records-cds-analysed-108942|url-status=live}}</ref>{{Dubious|date=March 2022|reason=generally manufacturing physical stuff emits more ghg than virtual so seems unlikely}} Another option for reducing energy use is downloading the music for offline listening to reduce the need for streaming over distance.<ref name=EnvironmentalImpact /> The Spotify service has a built-in local cache to reduce the necessity of repeating song streams.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://gigaom.com/2012/09/12/streaming-media-could-have-larger-carbon-footprint-than-plastic-discs/|title=Streaming media could have larger carbon footprint than plastic discs|last=Andrews|first=Robert|date=12 September 2012|website=gigaom.com|access-date=3 August 2019|archive-date=3 August 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190803132527/https://gigaom.com/2012/09/12/streaming-media-could-have-larger-carbon-footprint-than-plastic-discs/|url-status=live}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)