Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Negotiation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Positive affect === Even before the negotiation process starts, people in a positive mood have more confidence,<ref name="Kramer 1993">{{cite journal | last1 = Kramer | first1 = R. M. | last2 = Newton | first2 = E. | last3 = Pommerenke | first3 = P. L. | year = 1993 | title = Self-enhancement biases and negotiator judgment: Effects of self-esteem and mood | journal = Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes | volume = 56 | pages = 110β133 | doi=10.1006/obhd.1993.1047| doi-access = free }}</ref> and higher tendencies to plan to use a cooperative strategy.<ref name="Forgas 1998"/> During the negotiation, negotiators who are in a positive mood tend to enjoy the interaction more, show less contentious behavior, use less aggressive tactics,<ref name="Maiese">Maiese, Michelle [http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/emotion/ "Emotions"] ''Beyond Intractability''. Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Posted: July 2005 downloaded: 30 August 2007</ref> and more cooperative strategies.<ref name="Forgas 1998"/> This, in turn, increases the likelihood that parties will reach their instrumental goals, and enhance the ability to find integrative gains.<ref name="Carnevale 1986">{{cite journal | last1 = Carnevale | first1 = P. J. D. | last2 = Isen | first2 = A. M. | year = 1986 | title = The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation | journal = Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes | volume = 37 | pages = 1β13 | doi=10.1016/0749-5978(86)90041-5| hdl = 2027.42/26263 | url = https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/26263/1/0000344.pdf | hdl-access = free }}</ref> Indeed, compared with negotiators with negative or natural affectivity, negotiators with positive affectivity reached more agreements and tended to honor those agreements more.<ref name="Forgas 1998"/> Those favorable outcomes are due to better [[decision making|decision-making]] processes, such as flexible thinking, creative [[problem solving|problem-solving]], respect for others' perspectives, willingness to take risks, and higher confidence.<ref name="Barry 2004">Barry, B.; Fulmer, I. S.; & Van Kleef, G. A. (2004) "I laughed, I cried, I settled: The role of emotion in negotiation". In M. J. Gelfand & J. M. Brett (Eds.), ''The handbook of negotiation and culture'' (pp. 71β94). Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.</ref> The post-negotiation positive effect has beneficial consequences as well. It increases satisfaction with the achieved outcome and influences one's desire for future interactions.<ref name="Barry 2004"/> The PA aroused by reaching an agreement facilitates the dyadic relationship, which brings commitment that sets the stage for subsequent interactions.<ref name="Barry 2004"/><br /> PA also has its drawbacks: it distorts the perception of self-performance, such that performance is judged to be relatively better than it is.<ref name="Kramer 1993"/> Thus, studies involving self-reports on achieved outcomes might be biased.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)