Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Duckworth–Lewis–Stern method
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====Increased target: Team 1's innings cut short (resources lost at end of innings); Team 2's innings completed==== On [[2000–01 Australia Tri-Nation Series#7th match|25 January 2001, West Indies played Zimbabwe]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/65607.html|title=Full Scorecard of West Indies vs Zimbabwe, Australia Tri Series (CB Series), 7th Match|date=25 January 2001|work=Cricinfo|publisher=ESPN Sports Media}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cricketarchive.co.uk/Archive/Scorecards/71/71495.html|title=Scorecard|website=CricketArchive}} {{subscription required}}</ref> West Indies batted first and had reached 235–6 from 47 overs (of a scheduled 50) when rain halted play for two hours. At the restart, both innings were reduced to 47 overs, i.e. West Indies' innings was closed immediately, and Zimbabwe began their innings. {| class="wikitable" |- | rowspan="4" colspan="1" style="text-align: center;" |Step 1 | Total resources available to West Indies at the start of their innings | align="center" | 50 overs and 10 wickets | align="center" | 100.0% |- | Total resources remaining to West Indies when innings was closed | align="center" | 3 overs and 4 wickets | align="center" | 10.2% |- | Total resources available to West Indies (R1) | align="center" | 100.0% − 10.2% | align="center" | 89.8% |- | Total resources available to Zimbabwe (R2) | align="center" | 47 overs and 10 wickets | align="center" | 97.4% |- | rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="text-align: center;" |Step 2 | Zimbabwe's par score | align="center" | 235 + G50 × (R2 − R1)/100 = 235 + 225 × (97.4 − 89.8)/100 | align="center" | '''252.100 runs''' |} Zimbabwe's target was therefore 253 to win (in 47 overs), or 252 to tie. It is fair that their target was increased, even though they had the same number of overs to bat as West Indies, as West Indies would have batted more aggressively in their last few overs, and scored more runs, if they had known that their innings would be cut short at 47 overs. Zimbabwe were all out for 175, giving West Indies victory by 252 − 175 = 77 runs. These resource percentages are the ones which were in use back in 2001, before the 2002 revision, and so do not match the currently used percentages for the Standard Edition, which are slightly different. Also, the formula for Zimbabwe's par score comes from the Standard Edition of D/L, which was used at the time. Currently the Professional Edition is used, which has a different formula when R2>R1. The formula required Zimbabwe to match West Indies' performance with their overlapping 89.8% of resource (i.e. score 235 runs), and achieve average performance with their extra 97.4% − 89.8% = 7.6% of resource (i.e. score 7.6% of G50 (225 at the time) = 17.1 runs). As West Indies' innings was interrupted once (and not restarted), their resource is given by the general formula above as follows: Total resources available = 100% − Resources remaining at 1st interruption = 100% − 10.2% = 89.8%. {{anchor|AusvNL}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)