Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Hahn–Banach theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Notes== {{reflist|group=note|refs= * <ref group=note name="GeometricIllustration">Geometric illustration: The geometric idea of the above proof can be fully presented in the case of <math>X = \R^2, M = \{(x, 0) : x \in \R\}.</math> First, define the simple-minded extension <math>f_0(x, y) = f(x),</math> It doesn't work, since maybe <math>f_0 \leq p</math>. But it is a step in the right direction. <math>p-f_0</math> is still convex, and <math>p-f_0 \geq f-f_0.</math> Further, <math>f-f_0</math> is identically zero on the x-axis. Thus we have reduced to the case of <math>f = 0, p \geq 0</math> on the x-axis. If <math>p \geq 0</math> on <math>\R^2,</math> then we are done. Otherwise, pick some <math>v \in \R^2,</math> such that <math>p(v) < 0.</math> The idea now is to perform a simultaneous bounding of <math>p</math> on <math>v + M</math> and <math>-v+M</math> such that <math>p \geq b</math> on <math>v+M</math> and <math>p \geq -b</math> on <math>-v+M,</math> then defining <math>\tilde f(w + rv) = rb</math> would give the desired extension. Since <math>-v+M, v+M</math> are on opposite sides of <math>M,</math> and <math>p < 0</math> at some point on <math>v+M,</math> by convexity of <math>p,</math> we must have <math>p \geq 0</math> on all points on <math>-v+M.</math> Thus <math>\inf_{u\in -v + M} p(u)</math> is finite. Geometrically, this works because <math>\{z : p(z) < 0\}</math> is a convex set that is disjoint from <math>M,</math> and thus must lie entirely on one side of <math>M.</math> Define <math>b = -\inf_{u\in -v + M} p(u).</math> This satisfies <math>p\geq -b</math> on <math>-v+M.</math> It remains to check the other side. For all <math>v+w \in v+M,</math> convexity implies that for all <math>-v+w' \in -v+M, p(v+w) + p(-v +w') \geq 2p((w+w')/2) = 0,</math> thus <math>p(v + w) \geq \sup_{u\in -v + M} -p(u) = b.</math> Since during the proof, we only used convexity of <math>p</math>, we see that the lemma remains true for merely convex <math>p.</math> </ref> }} '''Proofs''' {{reflist|group=proof|refs= * <ref group=proof name="ProofNormOfExtensionIsLarger">The map <math>F</math> being an extension of <math>f</math> means that <math>\operatorname{domain} f \subseteq \operatorname{domain} F</math> and <math>F(m) = f(m)</math> for every <math>m \in \operatorname{domain} f.</math> Consequently, <math display=block>\{|f(m)| : \|m\| \leq 1, m \in \operatorname{domain} f\} = \{|F(m)|: \|m\| \leq 1, m \in \operatorname{domain} f\} \subseteq \{|F(x)\,| : \|x\| \leq 1, x \in \operatorname{domain} F\}</math> and so the [[supremum]] of the set on the left hand side, which is <math>\|f\|,</math> does not exceed the supremum of the right hand side, which is <math>\|F\|.</math> In other words, <math>\|f\| \leq \|F\|.</math> </ref> }}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)