Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Long tail
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Criticisms== A 2008 study by [[Anita Elberse]], professor of business administration at [[Harvard Business School]], calls the long tail theory into question, citing sales data which shows that the Web magnifies the importance of blockbuster hits.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Elberse|first=Anita|title=Should You Invest in the Long Tail?|url=http://hbr.org/2008/07/should-you-invest-in-the-long-tail/ar/1|magazine=Harvard Business Review|date=July 2008}}</ref> On his blog, Chris Anderson responded to the study, praising Elberse and the academic rigor with which she explores the issue but drawing a distinction between their respective interpretations of where the "head" and "tail" begin. Elberse defined head and tail using percentages, while Anderson uses absolute numbers.<ref name="andersonblog-elberse">{{cite web|url=http://www.longtail.com/the_long_tail/2008/06/excellent-hbr-p.html|author=Anderson, Chris|publisher=The Long Tail Blog|title=Excellent HBR piece challenging the Long Tail|date=27 June 2008}}</ref> Similar results were published by [[Serguei Netessine]] and Tom F. Tan, who suggest that head and tail should be defined by percentages rather than absolute numbers.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2338|title=Rethinking the Long Tail Theory: How to Define 'Hits' and 'Niches'|publisher=Knowledge@Wharton|date=16 September 2009}}</ref> Also in 2008, a sales analysis of an unnamed UK digital music service by economist [[Will Page]] and high-tech entrepreneur Andrew Bud found that sales exhibited a [[log-normal distribution]] rather than a power law; they reported that 80% of the music tracks available sold no copies at all over a one-year period. Anderson responded by stating that the study's findings are difficult to assess without access to its data.<ref>{{cite web|last=Anderson|first=Chris|title=More Long Tail debate: mobile music no, search yes|url=http://www.longtail.com/the_long_tail/2008/11/more-long-tail.html|publisher=The Long Tail|access-date=25 December 2011|date=8 November 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Foster|first=Patrick|title=Long Tail theory contradicted as study reveals 10m digital music tracks unsold|url=https://www.thetimes.com/business-money/companies/article/long-tail-theory-contradicted-as-study-reveals-10m-digital-music-tracks-unsold-cl0sqrbwl2b|publisher=Times Online|date=22 December 2008|newspaper=[[The Times]]}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)