Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Ramsey's theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Relationship to the axiom of choice == In [[reverse mathematics]], there is a significant difference in proof strength between the version of Ramsey's theorem for infinite graphs (the case ''n'' = 2) and for infinite multigraphs (the case ''n'' ≥ 3). The multigraph version of the theorem is equivalent in strength to the [[Second-order arithmetic#Arithmetical comprehension|arithmetical comprehension axiom]], making it part of the subsystem ACA<sub>0</sub> of [[second-order arithmetic]], one of the [[Reverse mathematics#The big five subsystems of second-order arithmetic|big five subsystems]] in reverse mathematics. In contrast, by a theorem of [[David Seetapun]], the graph version of the theorem is weaker than ACA<sub>0</sub>, and (combining Seetapun's result with others) it does not fall into one of the big five subsystems.<ref>{{cite book|last=Hirschfeldt|first=Denis R.|title=Slicing the Truth|title-link=Slicing the Truth|publisher=World Scientific|year=2014|series=Lecture Notes Series of the Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore|volume=28}}</ref> Over [[Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory|ZF]], however, the graph version implies the classical [[Kőnig's lemma]], whereas the converse implication does not hold,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Blass|first=Andreas|date=September 1977|title=Ramsey's theorem in the hierarchy of choice principles|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-symbolic-logic/article/abs/ramseys-theorem-in-the-hierarchy-of-choice-principles/929A11D7F1897B65F0D1378BB4097910|journal=The Journal of Symbolic Logic|language=en|volume=42|issue=3|pages=387–390|doi=10.2307/2272866|jstor=2272866 |issn=1943-5886}}</ref> since [[Kőnig's lemma]] is equivalent to countable choice from finite sets in this setting.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Forster|first1=T.E.|last2=Truss|first2=J.K.|date=January 2007|title=Ramsey's theorem and König's Lemma|url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00153-006-0025-z|journal=Archive for Mathematical Logic|language=en|volume=46|issue=1|pages=37–42|doi=10.1007/s00153-006-0025-z|issn=1432-0665}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)