Editing Argumentation theory (section)

== Further reading ==
{{refbegin|colwidth=30em}}
* J. Robert Cox and Charles Arthur Willard, eds. (1982). ''Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research''.
* {{cite journal|doi=10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X|title=On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games|journal=Artificial Intelligence|volume=77|issue=2|pages=321–357|year=1995|last1=Dung|first1=Phan Minh|doi-access=free}}
* Bondarenko, A., Dung, P. M., Kowalski, R., and [[Francesca Toni|Toni, F.]] (1997). "An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning", ''Artificial Intelligence'' 93(1–2), 63–101.
* Dung, P. M., Kowalski, R., and [[Francesca Toni|Toni, F.]] (2006). "Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation." ''Artificial Intelligence.'' 170(2), 114–159.
* Frans van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs (1993). ''Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse''
* Frans van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst (2004). ''A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach''.
* Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, & Jean H. M. Wagemans (2014). ''Handbook of Argumentation Theory'' (Revised edition). New York: Springer.
* Richard H. Gaskins (1993). ''Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse.'' [[Yale University Press]].
* Michael A. Gilbert (1997). ''Coalescent Argumentation''.
* Trudy Govier (1987). ''Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation.'' Dordrecht, Holland; Providence, RI: Foris Publications.
* Trudy Govier (2014). ''A Practical Study of Argument'', 7th ed. Australia; Boston, MA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning. (First edition published 1985.)
* Dale Hample. (1979). "Predicting belief and belief change using a cognitive theory of argument and evidence." ''Communication Monographs.'' 46, 142–146.
* Dale Hample. (1978). "Are attitudes arguable?" ''Journal of Value Inquiry.'' 12, 311–312.
* Dale Hample. (1978). "Predicting immediate belief change and adherence to argument claims." ''Communication Monographs,'' 45, 219–228.
* Dale Hample & Judy Hample. (1978). "Evidence credibility." ''Debate Issues.'' 12, 4–5.
* Dale Hample. (1977). "Testing a model of value argument and evidence." ''Communication Monographs.'' 14, 106–120.
* Dale Hample. (1977). "The Toulmin model and the syllogism." ''Journal of the American Forensic Association.'' 14, 1–9.
* Sally Jackson and Scott Jacobs, "Structure of Conversational Argument: Pragmatic Bases for the Enthymeme." ''The Quarterly Journal of Speech''. LXVI, 251–265.
* [[Ralph Johnson (philosopher)|Ralph H. Johnson]]. ''Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument.'' Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.
* Ralph H. Johnson. (1996). ''The Rise of Informal Logic''. Newport News, VA: Vale Press
* Ralph H. Johnson. (1999). ''The Relation Between Formal and Informal Logic''. ''Argumentation'', 13(3) 265–74.
* Ralph H. Johnson. & Blair, J. Anthony. (2006). ''Logical Self-Defense.''First published, McGraw Hill Ryerson, Toronto, ON, 1997, 1983, 1993. Reprinted, New York: Idebate Press.
* Ralph H. Johnson. & Blair, J. Anthony. (1987). The current state of informal logic. ''Informal Logic'' 9, 147–51.
* Ralph H. Johnson. & Blair, J. Anthony. (1996). Informal logic and critical thinking. In F. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), ''Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory.'' (pp.&nbsp;383–86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
* Ralph H. Johnson, Ralph. H. & Blair, J. Anthony. (2000). "Informal logic: An overview." ''Informal Logic.'' 20(2): 93–99.
* Ralph H. Johnson, Ralph. H. & Blair, J. Anthony. (2002). Informal logic and the reconfiguration of logic. In D. Gabbay, R. H. Johnson, H.-J. Ohlbach and J. Woods (Eds.). ''Handbook of the Logic of Argument and Inference: The Turn Towards the Practical''. (pp.&nbsp;339–396). Elsevier: North Holland.
* [[Chaïm Perelman]] and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca (1970). ''The New Rhetoric'', Notre Dame.
* [[Stephen Toulmin]] (1958). ''The Uses of Argument''.
* Stephen Toulmin (1964). ''The Place of Reason in Ethics''.
* [[Douglas N. Walton]] (1990). ''Practical Reasoning: Goal-Driven, Knowledge-Based, Action-Guiding Argumentation''. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
* Douglas N. Walton (1992). ''The Place of Emotion in Argument''. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
* Douglas N. Walton (1996). ''Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory''. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
* Douglas N. Walton (2006). ''Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation''. New York: Cambridge University Press.
* Douglas N. Walton (2013). ''Methods of Argumentation''. New York: Cambridge University Press.
* Douglas N. Walton (2016). ''Argument Evaluation and Evidence''. Cham: Springer
* [[Joseph W. Wenzel]] (1990). Three perspectives on argumentation. In R Trapp and J Scheutz, (Eds.), ''Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honour of Wayne Brockreide'' (9–26). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
* John Woods. (1980). What Is informal logic? In J.A. Blair & R. H. Johnson (Eds.), ''Informal Logic: The First International Symposium .''(pp.&nbsp;57–68). Point Reyes, CA: Edgepress.
* John Woods. (2000). How Philosophical Is Informal Logic? ''Informal Logic.'' 20(2): 139–167. 2000
* [[Charles Arthur Willard]] (1982). ''Argumentation and the Social Grounds of Knowledge''. University of Alabama Press.
* Charles Arthur Willard (1989). ''A Theory of Argumentation''. [[University of Alabama Press]].
* Charles Arthur Willard (1996). ''Liberalism and the Problem of Knowledge: A New Rhetoric for Modern Democracy.'' University of Chicago Press.
* [[Harald Wohlrapp]] (2008). ''Der Begriff des Arguments. Über die Beziehungen zwischen Wissen, Forschen, Glaube, Subjektivität und Vernunft''. Würzburg: Königshausen u. Neumann. {{ISBN|978-3-8260-3820-4}}
{{refend}}

===Flagship journals===
* ''Argumentation''
* ''Argumentation in Context''
* ''Informal Logic''
* ''Argumentation and Advocacy'' (formerly ''Journal of the American Forensic Association'')
* ''Social Epistemology''
* ''Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology''
* ''Journal of Argument and Computation''

{{logic}}
{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Argumentation Theory}}
[[Category:Debating]]
[[Category:Legal reasoning]]
[[Category:Social epistemology]]
[[Category:Informal arguments]]