Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Cardinality
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Real paradoxes === ==== Cantor's paradox ==== {{Main|Cantor's paradox}} [[Cantor's theorem]] state's that, for any set <math>A,</math> possibly infinite, its [[powerset]] <math>\mathcal{P}(A)</math> has a strictly greater cardinality. For example, this means there is no bijection from <math>\N</math> to <math>\mathcal{P}(\N) \sim \R.</math> [[Cantor's paradox]] is a paradox in [[naive set theory]], which shows that there cannot exist a "set of all sets" or "[[Universe (mathematics)|universe set]]". It starts by assuming there is some set of all sets, <math>U := \{x \; | \; x \,\text{ is a set} \},</math> then it must be that <math>U</math> is strictly smaller than <math>\mathcal{P}(U),</math> thus <math>|U| \leq |\mathcal{P}(U)| .</math> But since <math>U</math> contains all sets, we must have that <math>\mathcal{P}(U) \subseteq U,</math> and thus <math>|\mathcal{P}(U)| \leq |U|.</math> Therefore <math>|\mathcal{P}(U)| = |U|,</math> contradicting Cantor's theorem. This was one of the original paradoxes that added to the need for a formalized set theory to avoid these paradoxes. This paradox is usually resolved in formal set theories by disallowing [[unrestricted comprehension]] and the existence of a universe set. ==== Set of all cardinal numbers ==== Similar to Cantor's paradox, the paradox of the set of all cardinal numbers is a result due to unrestricted comprehension. It often uses the definition of cardinal numbers as ordinal numbers for representatives. It is related to the [[Burali-Forti paradox]]. It begins by assuming there is some set <math>S := \{ X \, | X \text{ is a cardinal number}\}.</math> Then, if there is some largest element <math>\aleph \in S ,</math> then the powerset <math>\mathcal{P}(\aleph)</math> is strictly greater, and thus not in <math>S.</math> Conversly, if there is no largest element, then the [[Union (set theory)#Arbitrary union|union]] <math>\bigcup S</math> contains the elements of all elements of <math>S,</math> and is therefore greater than or equal to each element. Since there is no largest element in <math>S,</math> for any element <math>x \in S,</math> there is another element <math>y \in S</math> such that <math>|x| < |y|</math> and <math>|y| \leq \Bigl| \bigcup S \Bigr|.</math> Thus, for any <math>x \in S,</math> <math>|x| < \Bigl| \bigcup S \Bigr|,</math> and so <math>\Bigl| \bigcup S \Bigr| \notin S.</math>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)