Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Highest averages method
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Modifications == === Thresholds === {{Main|Electoral threshold}} Many countries have electoral thresholds for representation, where parties must win a specified fraction of the vote in order to be represented; parties with fewer votes than the threshold requires for representation are eliminated.<ref name="Pukelsheim-2017-8" /> Other countries modify the first divisor to introduce a ''natural threshold''; when using the Webster method, the first divisor is often set to 0.7 or 1.0 (the latter being called the ''full-seat modification'').<ref name="Pukelsheim-2017-8" /> === Majority-preservation clause === A majority-preservation clause guarantees any party winning a majority of the vote will receive at least half the seats in a legislature.<ref name="Pukelsheim-2017-8" /> Without such a clause, it is possible for a party with slightly more than half the vote to receive just barely less than half the seats (if using a method other than D'Hondt).<ref name="Pukelsheim-2017-8" /> This is typically accomplished by adding seats to the legislature until an apportionment that preserves the majority for a parliament is found.<ref name="Pukelsheim-2017-8" /> === Quota-capped divisor method === {{Main|Rank-index method#Quota-capped divisor method}} A ''quota-capped divisor method'' is an apportionment method where we begin by assigning every state its lower quota of seats. Then, we add seats one-by-one to the state with the highest votes-per-seat average, so long as adding an additional seat does not result in the state exceeding its upper quota.<ref name="Balinski-1975" /> However, quota-capped divisor methods violate the [[participation criterion]] (also called [[population monotonicity]])βit is possible for a party to ''lose'' a seat as a result of winning ''more'' votes.<ref name="Balinski-1982" />{{Rp|Tbl.A7.2}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)