Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
March First Movement
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Rebuttals from the Korean diaspora === Korean-American independence activists attempted to sway U.S. public opinion on the protests through writings and speeches.{{Sfn|Palmer|2020|pp=199β200}}{{Sfn|Ku|2021|p=132}}<ref name="YNA 2019 7" /> They established the [[League of Friends of Korea]] in April, which was dedicated to publicizing the independence movement.{{Sfn|Palmer|2020|pp=205β206}}{{Sfn|Ku|2021|p=132}} The organization would eventually have branches in 19 cities and upwards of 10,000 members.{{Sfn|Palmer|2020|pp=205β206}} In 1921, Henry Chung published ''[[The Case of Korea]]'', a book that criticized Japanese colonialism and advocated for Korean independence.{{Sfn|Palmer|2020|pp=199β201}}{{Sfn|Ku|2021|pp=132β133}} Japan attempted to halt the book's publication. In spite of this, ''The New York Times'' published an abridged version of the book, and the entire book was submitted into the American [[Congressional Record]].{{Sfn|Ku|2021|pp=133β134|p=}} Chung gave dozens of talks on his book and, according to scholar Brandon Palmer, became a noted figure in American intellectual circles, with significant audiences at his talks.{{Sfn|Palmer|2020|pp=199β201}} Some of their writings strategically focused on the disproportionate persecution of Korean Christians, which they knew would evoke sympathy from American audiences. They also placed Korea's situation in the context of increasing Japanese colonialism and aggression, particularly that in China.{{Sfn|Palmer|2020|pp=201β202}} In Russia, Korean journalists published writings in newspapers such as the ''[[Ch'Εnggu Sinbo|Hanin Sinbo]]'' about the protests that were quoted by Russian journalists.<ref name="YNA 2019 8" /> According to the analysis of one South Korean journalist, international publications became increasingly skeptical of Japan's narratives as time progressed.<ref name="YNA 2019 14"/> According to the analysis of Palmer, Korean public relations efforts continued into the early 1920s. They attempted to push for recognition at the 1921β1922 [[Washington Naval Conference]], but were rebuffed. At the conference, Japan relinquished [[Shandong Problem|its holdings in Shandong]] and agreed to a number of demilitarization and openness policies. Palmer theorizes that these concessions quelled American criticisms of Japan.{{Sfn|Palmer|2020|pp=213β214}} Palmer argued that the pro-Korea media campaign had some lasting success in influencing American opinion of Japan and Korea. However, the overall American public remained apathetic about Korea, and no significant policy changes occurred as a result of it.{{Sfn|Palmer|2020|pp=207β208; 213β214}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)